Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.
University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 8;6(9):e011256. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011256.
In many countries, minority ethnic groups report poorer care in patient surveys. This could be because they get worse care or because they respond differently to such surveys. We conducted an experiment to determine whether South Asian people in England rate simulated GP consultations the same or differently from White British people. If these groups rate consultations similarly when viewing identical simulated consultations, it would be more likely that the lower scores reported by minority ethnic groups in real surveys reflect real differences in quality of care.
Experimental vignette study. Trained fieldworkers completed computer-assisted personal interviews during which participants rated 3 video recordings of simulated GP-patient consultations, using 5 communication items from the English GP Patient Survey. Consultations were shown in a random order, selected from a pool of 16.
Geographically confined areas of ∼130 households (output areas) in England, selected using proportional systematic sampling.
564 White British and 564 Pakistani adults recruited using an in-home face-to-face approach.
Mean differences in communication score (on a scale of 0-100) between White British and Pakistani participants, estimated from linear regression.
Pakistani participants, on average, scored consultations 9.8 points higher than White British participants (95% CI 8.0 to 11.7, p<0.001) when viewing the same consultations. When adjusted for age, gender, deprivation, self-rated health and video, the difference increased to 11.0 points (95% CI 8.5 to 13.6, p<0.001). The largest differences were seen when participants were older (>55) and where communication was scripted to be poor.
Substantial differences in ratings were found between groups, with Pakistani respondents giving higher scores than White British respondents to videos showing the same care. Our findings suggest that the lower scores reported by Pakistani patients in national surveys represent genuinely worse experiences of communication compared to the White British majority.
在许多国家,少数民族群体在患者调查中报告的护理质量较差。这可能是因为他们得到的护理更差,也可能是因为他们对这类调查的反应不同。我们进行了一项实验,以确定在英国的南亚人是否与白种英国人对模拟全科医生咨询的评价相同或不同。如果这些群体在观看完全相同的模拟咨询时对咨询的评价相似,那么少数民族群体在实际调查中报告的较低分数更有可能反映出护理质量的实际差异。
实验案例研究。经过培训的现场工作人员在计算机辅助的个人访谈中完成了工作,参与者使用英国全科医生患者调查中的 5 项沟通项目对 3 段模拟全科医生-患者咨询的视频记录进行了评分。咨询以随机顺序展示,从 16 个咨询中选择。
英格兰的 130 个左右家庭(输出区域)的地理限定区域,使用比例系统抽样选择。
通过家庭面对面的方式招募了 564 名白种英国人和 564 名巴基斯坦成年人。
从线性回归中估计白种英国人和巴基斯坦参与者在沟通评分(0-100 分制)上的平均差异。
当观看相同的咨询时,巴基斯坦参与者的平均评分比白种英国参与者高出 9.8 分(95%CI 8.0 至 11.7,p<0.001)。在调整年龄、性别、贫困程度、自我评估的健康状况和视频后,差异增加到 11.0 分(95%CI 8.5 至 13.6,p<0.001)。在参与者年龄较大(>55 岁)和沟通脚本较差的情况下,差异最大。
在评分方面,不同群体之间存在显著差异,巴基斯坦受访者对显示相同护理的视频给予的评分高于白种英国受访者。我们的研究结果表明,在全国性调查中,巴基斯坦患者报告的较低分数代表了与白种英国多数人相比,沟通体验确实更差。