• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

先进的氨水溶液后燃烧捕获工艺与 650MW 燃煤电站集成的技术经济评估。

Technoeconomic Assessment of an Advanced Aqueous Ammonia-Based Postcombustion Capture Process Integrated with a 650-MW Coal-Fired Power Station.

机构信息

CSIRO Energy, 10 Murray Dwyer Circuit, Mayfield West, New South Wales 2304, Australia.

Department of Chemical Engineering, Curtin University of Technology Australia , GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Oct 4;50(19):10746-10755. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02737. Epub 2016 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.6b02737
PMID:27611872
Abstract

Using a rigorous, rate-based model and a validated economic model, we investigated the technoeconomic performance of an aqueous NH-based CO capture process integrated with a 650-MW coal-fired power station. First, the baseline NH process was explored with the process design of simultaneous capture of CO and SO to replace the conventional FGD unit. This reduced capital investment of the power station by US$425/kW (a 13.1% reduction). Integration of this NH baseline process with the power station takes the CO-avoided cost advantage over the MEA process (US$67.3/tonne vs US$86.4/tonne). We then investigated process modifications of a two-stage absorption, rich-split configuration and interheating stripping to further advance the NH process. The modified process reduced energy consumption by 31.7 MW/h (20.2% reduction) and capital costs by US$55.4 million (6.7% reduction). As a result, the CO-avoided cost fell to $53.2/tonne: a savings of $14.1 and $21.9/tonne CO compared with the NH baseline and advanced MEA process, respectively. The analysis of energy breakdown and cost distribution indicates that the technoeconomic performance of the NH process still has great potential to be improved.

摘要

采用严格的基于速率的模型和经过验证的经济模型,我们研究了集成在 650MW 燃煤电厂中的水基 NH 基 CO 捕获工艺的技术经济性能。首先,我们探索了 NH 工艺的基线情况,同时对 CO 和 SO 进行了捕获,以替代传统的 FGD 装置。这使得电厂的资本投资减少了 42.5 美元/千瓦(减少了 13.1%)。将这个 NH 基线工艺与电厂集成,其 CO 减排成本比 MEA 工艺具有优势(67.3 美元/吨与 86.4 美元/吨)。然后,我们研究了两阶段吸收、富液分馏配置和加热汽提的工艺改进,以进一步推进 NH 工艺。改进后的工艺将能耗降低了 31.7MW/h(降低了 20.2%),并将资本成本降低了 5540 万美元(降低了 6.7%)。因此,CO 减排成本降至 53.2 美元/吨:与 NH 基线和先进的 MEA 工艺相比,分别节省了 14.1 美元和 21.9 美元/吨 CO。对能量分解和成本分布的分析表明,NH 工艺的技术经济性能仍有很大的改进空间。

相似文献

1
Technoeconomic Assessment of an Advanced Aqueous Ammonia-Based Postcombustion Capture Process Integrated with a 650-MW Coal-Fired Power Station.先进的氨水溶液后燃烧捕获工艺与 650MW 燃煤电站集成的技术经济评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Oct 4;50(19):10746-10755. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02737. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
2
Technical and Energy Performance of an Advanced, Aqueous Ammonia-Based CO2 Capture Technology for a 500 MW Coal-Fired Power Station.一种先进的基于氨水溶液的 CO2 捕获技术用于 500MW 燃煤电厂的技术和能源性能。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Aug 18;49(16):10243-52. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02258. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
3
Achieving Zero/Negative-Emissions Coal-Fired Power Plants Using Amine-Based Postcombustion CO Capture Technology and Biomass Cocombustion.采用基于胺的燃烧后 CO2 捕集技术和生物质混烧实现零/负排放燃煤电厂。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Feb 18;54(4):2429-2438. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b07388. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
4
Techno-economic assessment of polymer membrane systems for postcombustion carbon capture at coal-fired power plants.燃煤电厂燃烧后碳捕集用聚合物膜系统的技术经济评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Mar 19;47(6):3006-14. doi: 10.1021/es3050604. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
5
Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.通过二氧化碳捕集、利用和封存实现美国现有燃煤电厂脱碳的机会。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jul 7;49(13):7571-9. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01120. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
6
Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.评估美国环保署关于二氧化碳捕集和封存在新型化石燃料发电厂中作用的决定。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Jul 15;48(14):7723-9. doi: 10.1021/es501748r. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
7
A Techno-Economic Assessment of Hybrid Cooling Systems for Coal- and Natural-Gas-Fired Power Plants with and without Carbon Capture and Storage.燃煤和燃气电厂碳捕集与封存的混合冷却系统的技术经济评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Apr 5;50(7):4127-34. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00008. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
8
Should a coal-fired power plant be replaced or retrofitted?燃煤发电厂应该被替换还是进行改造?
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Dec 1;41(23):7980-6. doi: 10.1021/es0711009.
9
Cost structure of a postcombustion CO2 capture system using CaO.使用氧化钙的燃烧后二氧化碳捕集系统的成本结构。
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Aug 1;41(15):5523-7. doi: 10.1021/es070099a.
10
Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.重新评估燃煤电厂碳捕集的效率损失。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Oct 20;49(20):12576-84. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03052. Epub 2015 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the most likely low-emission electricity production systems in Estonia.爱沙尼亚最有可能的低排放发电系统比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 30;16(12):e0261780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261780. eCollection 2021.