Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Jul 15;48(14):7723-9. doi: 10.1021/es501748r. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
On September 20, 2013, the US Environmental and Protection Agency (EPA) proposed a revised rule for "Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units". These performance standards set limits on the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) that can be emitted per megawatt-hour (MWh) of electricity generation from new coal-fired and natural gas-fired power plants built in the US. These limits were based on determinations of "best system of emission reduction (BSER) adequately demonstrated". Central in this determination was evaluating whether Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) qualified as BSER. The proposed rule states that CCS qualifies as BSER for coal-fired generation but not for natural gas-fired generation. In this paper, we assess the EPA's analysis that resulted in this determination. We are not trying to judge what the absolute criteria are for CCS as the BSER but only the relative differences as related to coal- vs natural gas-fired technologies. We conclude that there are not enough differences between "base load" coal-fired and natural gas-fired power plants to justify the EPA's determination that CCS is the BSER for coal-fired power plants but not for natural gas-fired power plants.
2013 年 9 月 20 日,美国环境保护署(EPA)提出了一项针对“新建固定源温室气体排放标准:发电用的电厂”的修订规则。这些性能标准对美国新建的燃煤和燃气电厂每兆瓦时(MWh)发电所排放的二氧化碳(CO2)量设定了限制。这些限制是基于“最佳减排系统(BSER)充分证明”的确定。在这一确定中,核心是评估二氧化碳捕集与封存(CCS)是否有资格作为 BSER。拟议的规则规定,CCS 有资格作为燃煤发电的 BSER,但不具备燃气发电的资格。在本文中,我们评估了 EPA 的分析结果,该分析促成了这一决定。我们并不是试图判断 CCS 作为 BSER 的绝对标准是什么,而只是判断其相对于燃煤和燃气发电技术的相对差异。我们的结论是,“基载”燃煤和燃气电厂之间没有足够的差异,无法证明 EPA 的决定是正确的,即 CCS 是燃煤电厂的 BSER,但不是燃气电厂的 BSER。