Shinozaki Koichiro, Lampe Joshua W, Kim Junhwan, Yin Tai, Da Tong, Oda Shigeto, Hirasawa Hiroyuki, Becker Lance B
The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health System, 350 Community Dr., Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2016 Dec;4(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40635-016-0101-6. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
It is not yet clear whether hemofiltration can reduce blood cytokine levels sufficiently to benefit patients who suffer prolonged cardiac arrest (CA) treated with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We sought to assess effects of high-volume and standard volume continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) on blood cytokine levels and survival in a rat model of prolonged CA treated with CPB.
Sprague-Dawley male rats were subjected to 12 min of asphyxia to induce CA. CPB was initiated for resuscitation of animals and maintained for 30 min. Twenty-four rats were randomly assigned into three groups: without CVVH treatment (sham); standard volume CVVH at a filtration rate of 35-45 mL/kg/h; and high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF, 105-135 mL/kg/h). Hemofiltration was started simultaneously with CPB and maintained for 6 h. Plasma TNFα and IL-6 levels were measured at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 6 h after reperfusion. Survival time, neurological deficit score, and hemodynamic status were assessed.
All animals survived over 6 h and died within 24 h. There were no significant differences in survival time (log-rank test, sham vs. CVVH; p = 0.49, sham vs. HVHF; p = 0.33) or neurological deficit scores (ANOVA, p = 0.14) between the groups. There were no significant differences in blood cytokine levels between the groups. Mean blood pressure in sham group animals increased to 1.5-fold higher than baseline levels at 30 min. HVHF significantly reduced blood pressure to 0.7-fold of sham group (p < 0.01).
There was no improvement in mortality, neurological dysfunction, TNFα, or IL-6 levels in rats after prolonged CA with CPB on either hemofiltration group when compared to the sham group.
血液滤过是否能充分降低血液细胞因子水平,从而使接受体外循环(CPB)治疗的长时间心脏骤停(CA)患者获益,目前尚不清楚。我们试图评估高容量和标准容量连续性静脉-静脉血液滤过(CVVH)对接受CPB治疗的长时间CA大鼠模型血液细胞因子水平和生存率的影响。
将雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠窒息12分钟以诱导CA。启动CPB对动物进行复苏,并维持30分钟。24只大鼠随机分为三组:不进行CVVH治疗(假手术组);滤过率为35 - 45 mL/kg/h的标准容量CVVH组;以及高容量血液滤过(HVHF,105 - 135 mL/kg/h)组。血液滤过与CPB同时开始,并维持6小时。在再灌注后基线、0.5、1、2、3和6小时测量血浆TNFα和IL-6水平。评估生存时间、神经功能缺损评分和血流动力学状态。
所有动物均存活超过6小时,并在24小时内死亡。各组之间的生存时间(对数秩检验,假手术组与CVVH组;p = 0.49,假手术组与HVHF组;p = 0.33)或神经功能缺损评分(方差分析,p = 0.14)无显著差异。各组之间的血液细胞因子水平无显著差异。假手术组动物在30分钟时平均血压升高至基线水平的1.5倍。HVHF显著降低血压至假手术组的0.7倍(p < 0.01)。
与假手术组相比,在接受CPB治疗的长时间CA大鼠中,血液滤过组在死亡率、神经功能障碍、TNFα或IL-6水平方面均无改善。