Turku Clinical Biomaterials Centre (TCBC), University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Department of Biomaterials Science, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Lemminkäisenkatu 2, 20520, Turku, Finland.
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1717-1724. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1953-6. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
Bulk-fill resin composites (BFCs) are gaining popularity in restorative dentistry due to the reduced chair time and ease of application. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of increment thickness on dentin bond strength and light transmission of different BFCs and a new discontinuous fiber-reinforced composite.
One hundred eighty extracted sound human molars were prepared for a shear bond strength (SBS) test. The teeth were divided into four groups (n = 45) according to the resin composite used: regular particulate filler resin composite: (1) G-ænial Anterior [GA] (control); bulk-fill resin composites: (2) Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill [TEBF] and (3) SDR; and discontinuous fiber-reinforced composite: (4) everX Posterior [EXP]. Each group was subdivided according to increment thickness (2, 4, and 6 mm). The irradiance power through the material of all groups/subgroups was quantified (MARC® Resin Calibrator; BlueLight Analytics Inc.). Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test.
SBS and light irradiance decreased as the increment's height increased (p < 0.05), regardless of the type of resin composite used. EXP presented the highest SBS in 2- and 4-mm-thick increments when compared to other composites, although the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Light irradiance mean values arranged in descending order were (p < 0.05) EXP, SDR, TEBF, and GA.
As increment thickness increased, the light transmission decreased for all tested resin composites. Discontinuous fiber-reinforced composite showed the highest value of curing light transmission, which was also seen in improved bonding strength to the underlying dentin surface.
Discontinuous fiber-reinforced composite can be applied safely in bulks of 4-mm increments same as other bulk-fill composites, although, in 2-mm thickness, the investigated composites showed better performance.
由于减少椅旁时间和操作简便,大体积充填树脂复合材料(BFC)在修复牙科领域越来越受欢迎。本研究旨在评估不同 BFC 和一种新型不连续纤维增强型复合材料的分层厚度对牙本质粘结强度和透光率的影响。
180 颗人离体健康磨牙用于进行剪切粘结强度(SBS)测试。根据所使用的树脂复合材料将牙齿分为四组(n=45):常规颗粒填料树脂复合材料:(1)G-ænial Anterior [GA](对照组);大体积充填树脂复合材料:(2)Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill [TEBF]和(3)SDR;以及不连续纤维增强型复合材料:(4)everX Posterior [EXP]。每组根据分层厚度(2、4 和 6mm)进一步细分。使用 MARC® Resin Calibrator(BlueLight Analytics Inc.)定量测量所有组/亚组材料的辐照度。使用双因素方差分析(ANOVA)和 Tukey 事后检验对数据进行分析。
SBS 和光辐照度随分层高度的增加而降低(p<0.05),无论使用何种树脂复合材料。与其他复合材料相比,EXP 在 2 和 4mm 厚的分层中表现出最高的 SBS,但差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。光辐照度均值按降序排列为(p<0.05)EXP、SDR、TEBF 和 GA。
随着分层厚度的增加,所有测试的树脂复合材料的透光率均降低。不连续纤维增强型复合材料表现出最高的固化光透射值,这也表明其与牙本质表面的粘结强度提高。
不连续纤维增强型复合材料可以像其他大体积充填复合材料一样安全地应用于 4mm 的分层厚度,尽管在 2mm 厚度下,所研究的复合材料表现出更好的性能。