Cameron Brianna J, Bazemore Andrew W, Morley Christopher P
From Central New York Master of Public Health Alumnus, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY (BJC); the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies, Washington, DC (AWB); and the Departments of Family Medicine, Public Health & Preventive Medicine, and Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse (CPM).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;29(5):528-30. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.05.160063.
Departments of Family Medicine (DFMs) in the United States consistently received around 0.2% of total research funding dollars and 0.3% of all awards awarded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) across the years 2002 to 2014. We used the NIH Reporter tool to quantify the amount of funding and the number of grants received by DFMs from the NIH from 2002 to 2014, using criteria similar to those applied by previous researchers. NIH funding to DFMs as remained fairly consistent across the time period, at roughly 0.2% of total NIH funding and 0.3% of total grants awarded. Changing these proportions will likely require considerable effort to build research capacity within DFMs and their frontline practice research networks, and to shift policymaker and funder perceptions of the value of the FM research enterprise.
在2002年至2014年期间,美国的家庭医学系(DFMs)持续获得约占总研究资金0.2%的资金,以及美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)颁发的所有奖项的0.3%。我们使用NIH Reporter工具,采用与先前研究人员类似的标准,来量化2002年至2014年期间DFMs从NIH获得的资金数额和拨款数量。在这段时间里,NIH对DFMs的资金投入一直相当稳定,约占NIH总资金的0.2%和总拨款的0.3%。要改变这些比例,可能需要付出巨大努力来建设DFMs及其一线实践研究网络的研究能力,并改变政策制定者和资助者对家庭医学研究事业价值的看法。