Nickels Andrew S, Warner David O, Jenkins Sarah Michelle, Tilburt Jon, Hays J Taylor
Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care, Departments of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonary, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Feb;19(2):197-207. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw194. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
We sought to assess physician knowledge/beliefs, self-efficacy, and experience/practice patterns surrounding smoking cessation and electronic cigarettes.
An eight-page survey sent via US Postal service. The initial invitation included a $10 cash incentive and up to three invitations were sent. Fifteen hundred US physicians were identified with equal representation from primary care physicians (internal medicine and family practice), surgical care physicians (general surgeons and anesthesiologists), and pulmonologists.
Two hundred fourteen were not included in the analysis (183 non-deliverable, one deceased, 30 not practicing). 561/1286 (44%) remaining surveys were returned for analysis. Greater than 90% agreed that advising and assisting with smoking cessation is their responsibility; 86% advise and 65% assist their patients with smoking cessation more than 75% of the time. Approximately two-thirds of respondents report that their patients ask them about electronic cigarettes at least some of the time (≥25%); 58.4% report that they ask their patients about electronic cigarette use at least some of the time. Overall, 37.9% have at some point recommended electronic cigarettes to their patients that smoke, with 11.5% reporting recommending them at least 25% of the time. Surgical care providers appear less confident and less self-efficacious with smoking cessation, as well as with electronic cigarettes and appear less likely to endorse use of electronic cigarettes.
US physicians are frequently discussing electronic cigarettes in a clinical context and a substantial proportion of US physicians have recommended electronic cigarettes to their patients.
This study documents several important previously poorly characterized aspects of the role of electronic cigarettes in clinical care. The majority of US physicians are discussing electronic cigarettes in clinical contexts and a substantial proportion of US physicians have recommended electronic cigarettes to their patients. The extent of physician engagement on the topic of electronic cigarettes should be met with increased efforts to better characterize electronic cigarettes' appropriate role in smoking cessation and reduction.
我们试图评估医生围绕戒烟和电子烟的知识/信念、自我效能感以及经验/实践模式。
通过美国邮政服务发送一份八页的调查问卷。初始邀请包含10美元现金奖励,最多发送三次邀请。确定了1500名美国医生,其中初级保健医生(内科和家庭医学)、外科护理医生(普通外科医生和麻醉医生)以及肺科医生的比例相等。
214人未纳入分析(183人无法送达,1人去世,30人不再行医)。剩余的561/1286份(44%)调查问卷被返回用于分析。超过90%的人同意建议并协助患者戒烟是他们的责任;86%的人会建议患者戒烟,65%的人在超过75%的时间里会协助患者戒烟。大约三分之二的受访者表示,他们的患者至少有时(≥25%)会向他们询问电子烟的情况;58.4%的人表示,他们至少有时会询问患者是否使用电子烟。总体而言,37.9%的人在某个时候曾向吸烟的患者推荐过电子烟,11.5%的人表示至少在25%的时间里会推荐电子烟。外科护理提供者在戒烟以及电子烟方面似乎信心不足且自我效能感较低,并似乎不太可能认可使用电子烟。
美国医生经常在临床环境中讨论电子烟,并且相当一部分美国医生已向患者推荐过电子烟。
本研究记录了电子烟在临床护理中的作用此前几个未得到充分描述的重要方面。大多数美国医生在临床环境中讨论电子烟,并且相当一部分美国医生已向患者推荐过电子烟。应加大力度,更好地明确电子烟在戒烟和减少吸烟方面的适当作用,以应对医生对电子烟这一话题的参与程度。