Bader Alexandra P, Barone Claudia P, Smeds Matthew R
School of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
Department of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;46:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 May 29.
National smoking rates have declined; however, it remains the primary modifiable risk factor for nearly all vascular disease. While vascular surgeons have the availability to treat patients via medical or surgical/endovascular means, involvement in risk factor modification may be lacking. This study seeks to understand vascular surgeons' involvement in tobacco cessation and risk factor modification and to determine if practice variables had any effect on provision of these services to vascular surgery patients.
Anonymous electronic surveys examining tobacco cessation and risk factor modification were sent to the Vascular & Endovascular Surgery Society members (n = 633). Influence of time from training, practice type (dichotomized into academic and nonacademic vascular surgeons), hospital size, region, and workload was assessed, and data were analyzed by univariate contingency tables.
A total of 149 (24%) surveys were completed. While the majority of respondents ask patient's smoking status (97%), assess willingness to quit (84%), and advise patients to quit (95%), only 34% prescribe medications to assist in cessation, 7% see patients in tobacco cessation follow-up, and 3% verify cessation with cotinine levels or carbon monoxide monitoring. Surgeons who prescribed medications for cessation are more likely to assess patient's willingness to quit, prescribe/advise nicotine replacement, or prescribe initial statin or other lipid-lowering medications. There was no difference in perceived education received during training in risk factor modification, but only 26% of respondents thought they were well trained. Comparing academic to private practice vascular surgeons, there was no difference in cessation techniques used; however, academic surgeons were less likely to perform endovascular procedures for claudication in patients who continued to smoke (29% vs. 46%, P = 0.03) and more likely to prescribe an initial antihyperlipid medication (65% vs. 39%, P = 0.0018).
Tobacco dependence remains a critical issue for vascular surgery patients; however, there is wide variation in cessation techniques used. The majority of vascular surgeons are not well versed in cessation techniques and risk factor modification, and thus, efforts should be made to provide this education in vascular surgery training programs.
全国吸烟率已有所下降;然而,吸烟仍是几乎所有血管疾病的主要可改变风险因素。虽然血管外科医生可以通过药物治疗或手术/血管内介入手段治疗患者,但在风险因素调整方面的参与度可能不足。本研究旨在了解血管外科医生在戒烟和风险因素调整方面的参与情况,并确定实践变量是否对为血管外科患者提供这些服务有任何影响。
向血管与血管内外科协会成员(n = 633)发送了关于戒烟和风险因素调整的匿名电子调查问卷。评估了从培训开始的时间、实践类型(分为学术型和非学术型血管外科医生)、医院规模、地区和工作量的影响,并通过单变量列联表对数据进行分析。
共完成了149份(24%)调查问卷。虽然大多数受访者询问患者的吸烟状况(97%)、评估戒烟意愿(84%)并建议患者戒烟(95%),但只有34%的人开戒烟药物,只有7%的人对戒烟患者进行随访,只有3%的人通过可替宁水平或一氧化碳监测来核实戒烟情况。开戒烟药物的外科医生更有可能评估患者的戒烟意愿、开处方/建议使用尼古丁替代疗法,或开初始他汀类药物或其他降脂药物。在风险因素调整培训期间接受的认知教育方面没有差异,但只有26%的受访者认为自己接受了良好的培训。比较学术型和私立执业血管外科医生,在使用的戒烟技术方面没有差异;然而,学术型外科医生对继续吸烟的间歇性跛行患者进行血管内介入手术的可能性较小(29%对46%,P = 0.03),而开初始抗高血脂药物的可能性较大(65%对39%,P = 0.0018)。
烟草依赖仍然是血管外科患者的一个关键问题;然而,所使用的戒烟技术存在很大差异。大多数血管外科医生对戒烟技术和风险因素调整并不精通,因此,应努力在血管外科培训项目中提供此类教育。