Phipps A J, Beggs D S, Murray A J, Mansell P D, Stevenson M A, Pyman M F
Rochester Veterinary Practice, 72 Lowry Street, Rochester, 3651, Australia.
Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Werribee, 3030, Australia.
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Nov;99(11):8981-8990. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11200. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
One of the major challenges for dairy producers is to produce, harvest, and store high-quality colostrum and feed it to their replacement heifer calves. Limited published data are available in Australia regarding the relationship between colostrum management, hygiene, and quality. The objectives of this study were to investigate (1) the colostrum storage and handling practices carried out on farm; (2) the immunoglobulin concentration and bacterial composition of colostrum being fed to replacement dairy heifer calves; (3) the percentage of colostrum being fed to replacement dairy heifer calves that meet industry recommendations; and (4) risk factors for bacterial contamination of colostrum. The study was carried out on 24 dairy farms located near Rochester, Victoria, Australia. Two hundred forty colostrum samples were collected (10 samples per farm). Each farm harvested and stored first-milking colostrum under normal farm conditions. A 10-mL sample of the colostrum was collected in a sterile container immediately before feeding, and a Brix refractometer reading was taken. The samples were then frozen at -4°C and submitted for bacterial concentration analysis. Fifty-eight percent of colostrum samples met the recommended industry standard of a total plate count (TPC) of <100,000cfu/mL, and 94% of colostrum samples met the recommended industry standard of total coliform count (TCC) of 10,000cfu/mL. However, when all the current industry recommendations for TPC, TCC, and Brix refractometer percentage for colostrum quality were considered, only 23% of the samples met all standards. These findings demonstrate that a large number of calves were at risk of receiving colostrum of poor quality, with high bacterial loads that may have interfered with the acquisition of transfer of passive immunity and affected calf health. Further investigation is required to identify the farm-specific factors that may influence the level of bacterial contamination of colostrum. Recommendations as a result of this study include refrigeration of excess colostrum shortly (within 1h) after collection and thorough disinfection of the calf feeding apparatus before use.
奶农面临的主要挑战之一是生产、收获和储存高质量的初乳,并将其喂给后备小母牛犊。在澳大利亚,关于初乳管理、卫生和质量之间关系的公开数据有限。本研究的目的是调查:(1)农场进行的初乳储存和处理做法;(2)喂给后备奶牛小母牛犊的初乳中的免疫球蛋白浓度和细菌组成;(3)喂给后备奶牛小母牛犊且符合行业建议的初乳百分比;(4)初乳细菌污染的风险因素。该研究在澳大利亚维多利亚州罗切斯特附近的24个奶牛场进行。收集了240份初乳样本(每个农场10份样本)。每个农场在正常农场条件下收获并储存首次挤奶的初乳。在喂食前,立即在无菌容器中收集10毫升初乳样本,并进行乳稠计读数。然后将样本在-4°C下冷冻,并提交进行细菌浓度分析。58%的初乳样本符合行业推荐的总平板计数(TPC)<100,000cfu/mL的标准,94%的初乳样本符合行业推荐的总大肠菌群计数(TCC)10,000cfu/mL的标准。然而,当考虑目前所有关于初乳质量的TPC、TCC和乳稠计百分比的行业建议时,只有23%的样本符合所有标准。这些发现表明,大量犊牛有收到质量差的初乳的风险,细菌载量高,这可能会干扰被动免疫的获得并影响犊牛健康。需要进一步调查以确定可能影响初乳细菌污染水平的农场特定因素。本研究的建议包括在收集后不久(1小时内)对多余的初乳进行冷藏,并在使用前对犊牛喂食器具进行彻底消毒。