Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk Wioletta, Skrzyński Witold, Fabiszewska Ewa
Department of Medical Physics, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Pol J Radiol. 2016 Aug 18;81:386-91. doi: 10.12659/PJR.897304. eCollection 2016.
Different methods of image quality evaluation are routinely used for analogue and digital mammography systems in Poland. In the present study, image quality for several screen-film (SF), computed radiography (CR), and fully digital (DR) mammography systems was compared directly with the use of the ACR mammography accreditation phantom.
MATERIAL/METHODS: Image quality and mean glandular doses were measured and compared for 47 mammography systems in the Mazovia Voivodeship in Poland, including 26 SF systems, 12 CR systems, and 9 DR systems. The mean glandular dose for the breast simulated by 4.5 cm of PMMA was calculated with methods described in the "European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis". Visibility of the structures in the image (fibers, microcalcifications, and masses) was evaluated with the mammographic accreditation ACR phantom.
Image quality for DR systems was significantly higher than for SF and CR systems. Several SF systems failed to pass the image quality tests because of artifacts. The doses were within acceptable limits for all of the systems, but the doses for the CR systems were significantly higher than for the SF and DR systems.
The best image quality, at a reasonably low dose, was observed for the DR systems. The CR systems are capable of obtaining the same image quality as the SF systems, but only at a significantly higher dose. The ACR phantom can be routinely used to evaluate image quality for all types of mammographic systems.
在波兰,不同的图像质量评估方法通常用于模拟和数字乳腺摄影系统。在本研究中,使用美国放射学会(ACR)乳腺摄影认证体模直接比较了几种屏-片(SF)、计算机X线摄影(CR)和全数字(DR)乳腺摄影系统的图像质量。
材料/方法:对波兰马佐夫舍省的47个乳腺摄影系统的图像质量和平均腺体剂量进行了测量和比较,其中包括26个SF系统、12个CR系统和9个DR系统。采用《乳腺癌筛查与诊断质量保证欧洲指南》中描述的方法,计算了用4.5厘米厚的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)模拟的乳房的平均腺体剂量。使用乳腺摄影认证ACR体模评估图像中结构(纤维、微钙化和肿块)的可见性。
DR系统的图像质量显著高于SF和CR系统。由于伪影,几个SF系统未能通过图像质量测试。所有系统的剂量均在可接受范围内,但CR系统的剂量显著高于SF和DR系统。
在合理低剂量下,DR系统的图像质量最佳。CR系统能够获得与SF系统相同的图像质量,但剂量要高得多。ACR体模可常规用于评估所有类型乳腺摄影系统的图像质量。