Molina Ramon M, Konduru Nagarjun V, Hirano Hugo, Donaghey Thomas C, Adamo Benoit, Laurenzi Brendan, Pyrgiotakis Georgios, Brain Joseph D
a Molecular and Integrative Physiological Sciences Program, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston , MA , USA and.
b MannKind Corporation , Danbury , CT , USA.
Inhal Toxicol. 2016 Oct;28(12):550-560. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2016.1226449. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
Particles can be delivered to the respiratory tract of animals using various techniques. Inhalation mimics environmental exposure but requires large amounts of aerosolized NPs over a prolonged dosing time, varies in deposited dose among individual animals, and results in nasopharyngeal and fur particle deposition. Although less physiological, intratracheal (IT) instillation allows quick and precise dosing. Insufflation delivers particles in their dry form as an aerosol. We compared the distribution of neutron-activated CeO nanoparticles (5 mg/kg) in rats after (1) IT instillation, (2) left intrabronchial instillation, (3) microspraying of nanoceria suspension and (4) insufflation of nanoceria dry powder. Blood, tracheobronchial lymph nodes, liver, gastrointestinal tract, feces and urine were collected at 5 min and 24 h post-dosing. Excised lungs from each rat were dried at room temperature while inflated at a constant 30 cm water pressure. Dried lungs were then sliced into 50 pieces. The radioactivity of each lung piece and other organs was measured. The evenness index (EI) of each lung piece was calculated [EI = (μCi/mg)/(μCi/mg)]. The degree of EI value departure from 1.0 is a measure of deposition heterogeneity. We showed that the pulmonary distribution of nanoceria differs among modes of administration. Dosing by IT or microspraying resulted in similar spatial distribution. Insufflation resulted in significant deposition in the trachea and in more heterogeneous lung distribution. Our left intrabronchial instillation technique yielded a concentrated deposition into the left lung. We conclude that animal dosing techniques and devices result in varying patterns of particle deposition that will impact biokinetic and toxicity studies.
可以使用多种技术将颗粒递送至动物的呼吸道。吸入法模拟环境暴露,但在较长的给药时间内需要大量雾化的纳米颗粒,不同动物个体的沉积剂量存在差异,并且会导致鼻咽部和皮毛颗粒沉积。尽管不太符合生理情况,但气管内(IT)滴注可实现快速精确给药。吹入法以气溶胶形式输送干燥的颗粒。我们比较了经(1)IT滴注、(2)左支气管内滴注、(3)纳米氧化铈悬浮液微喷雾和(4)纳米氧化铈干粉吹入后,中子活化的CeO纳米颗粒(5mg/kg)在大鼠体内的分布情况。给药后5分钟和24小时收集血液、气管支气管淋巴结、肝脏、胃肠道、粪便和尿液。从每只大鼠身上切除的肺在室温下充气至恒定的30cm水柱压力时进行干燥。然后将干燥的肺切成50片。测量每片肺和其他器官的放射性。计算每片肺的均匀度指数(EI)[EI =(μCi/mg)/(μCi/mg)]。EI值偏离1.0的程度是沉积异质性的一种度量。我们发现纳米氧化铈在肺部的分布因给药方式而异。通过IT滴注或微喷雾给药导致的空间分布相似。吹入法导致在气管中大量沉积,且肺部分布更不均匀。我们的左支气管内滴注技术使药物集中沉积在左肺。我们得出结论,动物给药技术和装置会导致颗粒沉积模式不同,这将影响生物动力学和毒性研究。