Jang Sung Ill, Lee Kwang-Hun, Yoon Hong Jin, Lee Dong Ki
Department of Internal Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Medicine, The Graduate School of Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May;85(5):1057-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.047. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
Although nonsurgical methods produce high clinical success rates in the treatment of benign biliary stricture (BBS), conventional methods are not always successful in cases of severe biliary stricture or complete obstruction. Therefore, the efficacy of magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA) for treatment of refractory BBS was evaluated in a single-center, nonrandomized study.
MCA was performed in patients with BBS that was not resolved by conventional endoscopic or percutaneous treatments. One magnet was delivered through the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage tract, and the other advanced through 1 of 3 different routes. After magnet approximation and recanalization, an internal drainage catheter was placed for 6 months.
This study followed 39 patients who underwent MCA after the development of postoperative or traumatic strictures. Recanalization was achieved successfully in 35 patients. There was an acceptable procedure-related adverse event of mild cholangitis in 1 patient and no procedure-related mortalities. The average elapsed time from magnet approximation to removal was 57.4 days (range, 13-182 days), and the mean follow-up period after recanalization was 41.9 months (range, 7.1-73.4 months). Restenosis after MCA recurred in 1 patient, and partial restenosis occurred in another patient, but recanalization in these patients was successful using a guidewire via the percutaneous and endoscopic tracts.
MCA represents an alternative nonsurgical recanalization method for BBSs that cannot be treated by conventional methods. The rate of stricture recurrence after MCA was lower than that after conventional methods, likely because of the creation of a new fistula tract instead of dilation of a previous stricture.
尽管非手术方法在良性胆管狭窄(BBS)治疗中取得了较高的临床成功率,但传统方法在严重胆管狭窄或完全梗阻病例中并非总能成功。因此,在一项单中心、非随机研究中评估了磁性压缩吻合术(MCA)治疗难治性BBS的疗效。
对经传统内镜或经皮治疗未缓解的BBS患者实施MCA。一枚磁体经皮经肝胆道引流途径置入,另一枚通过3种不同途径之一推进。磁体接近并再通后,放置内引流导管6个月。
本研究纳入了39例术后或创伤性狭窄后接受MCA的患者。35例患者成功实现再通。1例患者发生了可接受的与手术相关的轻度胆管炎不良事件,无手术相关死亡病例。从磁体接近到取出的平均时间为57.4天(范围13 - 182天),再通后的平均随访期为41.9个月(范围7.1 - 73.4个月)。1例患者MCA再通后发生再狭窄,另1例患者发生部分再狭窄,但通过经皮和内镜途径使用导丝成功实现了这些患者的再通。
MCA是一种用于无法用传统方法治疗的BBS的替代性非手术再通方法。MCA后狭窄复发率低于传统方法,可能是因为形成了新的瘘道而非扩张先前的狭窄。