Chase Jo-Ana D, Phillips Lorraine J, Brown Marybeth
J Aging Phys Act. 2017 Jan;25(1):149-170. doi: 10.1123/japa.2016-0040. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effects of supervised resistance and/or aerobic training physical activity interventions on performance-based measures of physical functioning among community-dwelling older adults, and to identify factors impacting intervention effectiveness. Diverse search strategies were used to identify eligible studies. Standardized mean difference effect sizes (d, ES) were synthesized using a random effects model. Moderator analyses were conducted using subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Twenty-eight studies were included. Moderator analyses were limited by inconsistent reporting of sample and intervention characteristics. The overall mean ES was 0.45 (k = 38, p ≤ .01), representing a clinically meaningful reduction of 0.92 s in the Timed Up and Go for treatment versus control. More minutes per week (p < .01) and longer intervention session duration (p < .01) were associated with larger effects. Interventions were especially effective among frail participants (d = 1.09). Future research should clearly describe sample and intervention characteristics and incorporate frail populations.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是确定有监督的阻力训练和/或有氧运动干预对社区居住老年人基于表现的身体功能测量指标的影响,并确定影响干预效果的因素。采用了多种检索策略来识别符合条件的研究。使用随机效应模型综合标准化均数差效应量(d,ES)。使用亚组分析和meta回归进行调节分析。纳入了28项研究。调节分析因样本和干预特征报告不一致而受到限制。总体平均ES为0.45(k = 38,p≤.01),这意味着治疗组与对照组相比,“起立行走测试”时间在临床上有意义地减少了0.92秒。每周训练分钟数更多(p <.01)和干预疗程持续时间更长(p <.01)与更大的效应相关。干预在体弱参与者中尤其有效(d = 1.09)。未来的研究应清晰描述样本和干预特征,并纳入体弱人群。