Wu Gang, Jin Teng, Li Ting, Li Xiaoming
Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Department of Radiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Wuhan NO.1 Hospital, Department of Radiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Eur J Radiol Open. 2016 Aug 28;3:239-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2016.08.006. eCollection 2016.
To evaluate the diagnostic value of time resolved magnetic resonance angiography with interleaved stochastic trajectory (TWIST) using Gadobutrol for preoperative evaluation of lower extremity tumors.
This prospective study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board. 50 consecutive patients (31 men, 19 women, age range 18-80 years, average age 42.7 years) with lower extremity tumors underwent TWIST and computed tomography angiography (CTA). Image quality of TWIST and CTA were evaluated by two radiologists according to a 4-point scale. The degree of arterial stenosis caused by tumor was assessed using TWSIT and CTA separately, and the intra-modality agreement was determined using a kappa test. The number of feeding arteries identified by TWIST was compared with that by CTA using Wilcoxon signed rank test. The ability to identify arterio-venous fistulae (AVF) were compared using a chi-square test.
Image quality of TWIST and CTA were rated as 3.88 ± 0.37 and 3.97 ± 0.16, without statistically significant difference (P = 0.135). Intra-modality agreement was excellent for the assessment of arterial stenosis (kappa = 0.806 ± 0.073 for Reader 1, kappa = 0.805 ± 0.073 for Reader 2). Readers identified AVF with TWIST in 27 of 50 cases, and identified AVF with CTA in 14 of 50 (P < 0.001). Mean feeding arteries identified with TWIST was significantly more than that with CTA (2.08 ± 1.72 vs 1.62 ± 1.52, P = 0.02).
TWIST is a reliable imaging modality for the assessment of lower extremity tumors. TWIST is comparable to CTA for the identification of AVF and feeding arteries.
评估使用钆布醇的具有交错随机轨迹的时间分辨磁共振血管造影(TWIST)对下肢肿瘤术前评估的诊断价值。
本前瞻性研究经当地机构审查委员会批准。50例连续的下肢肿瘤患者(31例男性,19例女性,年龄范围18 - 80岁,平均年龄42.7岁)接受了TWIST和计算机断层血管造影(CTA)检查。两名放射科医生根据4分制对TWIST和CTA的图像质量进行评估。分别使用TWIST和CTA评估肿瘤引起的动脉狭窄程度,并使用kappa检验确定模态内一致性。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较TWIST和CTA识别的供血动脉数量。使用卡方检验比较识别动静脉瘘(AVF)的能力。
TWIST和CTA的图像质量评分分别为3.88 ± 0.37和3.97 ± 0.16,无统计学显著差异(P = 0.135)。在评估动脉狭窄方面,模态内一致性极佳(读者1的kappa = 0.806 ± 0.073,读者2的kappa = 0.805 ± 0.073)。读者使用TWIST在50例病例中的27例中识别出AVF,使用CTA在50例中的14例中识别出AVF(P < 0.001)。TWIST识别的平均供血动脉明显多于CTA(2.08 ± 1.72对1.62 ± 1.52,P = 0.02)。
TWIST是评估下肢肿瘤的可靠成像方式。在识别AVF和供血动脉方面,TWIST与CTA相当。