Ding Yingying, Wang Zhihong, Zhang Xi, Teng Zheng, Gao Caixia, Qian Baohua, Wang Lili, Feng Jiaojiao, Wang Jinhong, Zhao Chunyan, Guo Cunjiu, Pan Wei
Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Basic Medicine, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Clinical Laboratory, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical College, Taiyuan, China.
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 13;11(9):e0162820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162820. eCollection 2016.
Coxsackievirus A16 (CA16) is one of the major causative agents of hand, foot, and mouth disease worldwide. The non-neutralizing antibody response that targets CA16 VP1 remains poorly elucidated. In the present study, antibody responses against CA16 VP1 in Shanghai blood donors and Shanxi individuals were analyzed by ELISA and inhibitory ELISA using five CA16 VP1 antigens: VP11-297, VP141-297, VP11-60, VP145-58 and VP161-297. The correlation coefficients for most of the reactions against each of the five antigens and the inhibition of the anti-CA16 VP1 antibody response produced by the various antigens were higher in Shanghai blood donors compared to those in Shanxi individuals. VP11-297 and VP141-297 strongly inhibited the anti-CA16 VP1 response in serum samples from both populations, while VP145-58 and VP161-297 intermediately and weakly inhibited the anti-CA16 VP1 response, respectively, in only Shanghai group. A specific type of inhibition (anti-CA16 VP1 was completely inhibited by both VP11-60 and VP141-297) characterized by high neutralizing antibody titers was identified and accounted for 71.4% of the strongly reactive samples from the Shanghai group. These results indicate that the Shanghai blood donors exhibited a consistent and specific antibody response, while the Shanxi individuals showed an inconsistent and non-specific antibody response. These findings may improve the understanding of host humoral immunity against CA16 and help to identify an effective approach for seroepidemiological surveillance and specific diagnosis of CA16 infection based on normal and competitive ELISA.
柯萨奇病毒A16(CA16)是全球手足口病的主要病原体之一。针对CA16 VP1的非中和抗体反应仍未得到充分阐明。在本研究中,使用五种CA16 VP1抗原(VP11-297、VP141-297、VP11-60、VP145-58和VP161-297),通过ELISA和抑制性ELISA分析了上海献血者和山西个体中针对CA16 VP1的抗体反应。与山西个体相比,上海献血者针对这五种抗原中每一种的大多数反应以及各种抗原对抗CA16 VP1抗体反应的抑制的相关系数更高。VP11-297和VP141-297强烈抑制了两个群体血清样本中的抗CA16 VP1反应,而VP145-58和VP161-297分别仅在上海组中对抗CA16 VP1反应有中度和弱抑制作用。鉴定出一种以高中和抗体滴度为特征的特异性抑制类型(抗CA16 VP1被VP11-60和VP141-297完全抑制),该类型占上海组强反应性样本的71.4%。这些结果表明,上海献血者表现出一致且特异性的抗体反应,而山西个体表现出不一致且非特异性的抗体反应。这些发现可能会增进对宿主针对CA16的体液免疫的理解,并有助于确定一种基于常规和竞争性ELISA的CA16感染血清流行病学监测和特异性诊断的有效方法。