Koppenhaver Shane L, Walker Michael J, Rettig Charles, Davis Joel, Nelson Chenae, Su Jonathan, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas Cesar, Hebert Jeffrey J
U.S. Army-Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, San Antonio, TX, United States.
South College Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Physiotherapy. 2017 Jun;103(2):131-137. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 20.
To investigate the relationship between dry needling-induced twitch response and change in pain, disability, nociceptive sensitivity, and lumbar multifidus muscle function, in patients with low back pain (LBP).
Quasi-experimental study.
Department of Defense Academic Institution.
Sixty-six patients with mechanical LBP (38 men, 28 women, age: 41.3 [9.2] years).
Dry needling treatment to the lumbar multifidus muscles between L3 and L5 bilaterally.
Examination procedures included numeric pain rating, the Modified Oswestry Disability Index, pressure algometry, and real-time ultrasound imaging assessment of lumbar multifidus muscle function before and after dry needling treatment. Pain pressure threshold (PPT) was used to measure nocioceptive sensitivity. The percent change in muscle thickness from rest to contraction was calculated to represent muscle function. Participants were dichotomized and compared based on whether or not they experienced at least one twitch response on the most painful side and spinal level during dry needling.
Participants experiencing local twitch response during dry needling exhibited greater immediate improvement in lumbar multifidus muscle function than participants who did not experience a twitch (thickness change with twitch: 12.4 [6]%, thickness change without twitch: 5.7 [11]%, mean difference adjusted for baseline value, 95%CI: 4.4 [1 to 8]%). However, this difference was not present after 1-week, and there were no between-groups differences in disability, pain intensity, or nociceptive sensitivity.
The twitch response during dry needling might be clinically relevant, but should not be considered necessary for successful treatment.
探讨腰椎穿刺术诱发的抽搐反应与腰痛(LBP)患者疼痛、功能障碍、伤害性敏感性和腰多裂肌功能变化之间的关系。
准实验研究。
国防部学术机构。
66例机械性腰痛患者(38例男性,28例女性,年龄:41.3[9.2]岁)。
双侧L3至L5之间的腰多裂肌进行干针治疗。
检查程序包括数字疼痛评分、改良Oswestry功能障碍指数、压力痛觉测定法以及干针治疗前后腰多裂肌功能的实时超声成像评估。疼痛压力阈值(PPT)用于测量伤害性敏感性。计算从休息到收缩时肌肉厚度的变化百分比以代表肌肉功能。根据患者在干针治疗期间最疼痛侧和脊柱水平是否经历至少一次抽搐反应进行二分法分组并比较。
在干针治疗期间经历局部抽搐反应的参与者比未经历抽搐的参与者腰多裂肌功能立即改善更大(有抽搐时的厚度变化:12.4[6]%,无抽搐时的厚度变化:5.7[11]%,根据基线值调整后的平均差异,95%CI:4.4[1至8]%)。然而,1周后这种差异不存在,并且在功能障碍、疼痛强度或伤害性敏感性方面两组之间没有差异。
干针治疗期间的抽搐反应可能具有临床相关性,但不应被视为成功治疗的必要条件。