Suppr超能文献

An evaluation of cytologic sampling techniques. A comparative study.

作者信息

Garite T J, Feldman M J

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 1978 Mar-Apr;22(2):83-5.

PMID:276236
Abstract

False negative cervical cytology is primarily due to errors in sampling. It has been demonstrated that combined ectocervical and endocervical sampling techniques will improve the yield. A prospective study was done to compare ectocervical and combined sampling with a selective technique in which the examiner determines the location of the squamocolumnar junction and chooses the appropriate method. The results demonstrate that combined ectocervical and endocervical sampling significantly increases the number of positive Papanicolaou smears. Selecting which cervices should be samples ectocervically and which need combined sampling does not significantly improve the yield over ectocervical sampling alone. It is the conclusion of this study that both ectocervical and endocervical sampling should routinely be used.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验