Suppr超能文献

An evaluation of cytologic sampling techniques. A comparative study.

作者信息

Garite T J, Feldman M J

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 1978 Mar-Apr;22(2):83-5.

PMID:276236
Abstract

False negative cervical cytology is primarily due to errors in sampling. It has been demonstrated that combined ectocervical and endocervical sampling techniques will improve the yield. A prospective study was done to compare ectocervical and combined sampling with a selective technique in which the examiner determines the location of the squamocolumnar junction and chooses the appropriate method. The results demonstrate that combined ectocervical and endocervical sampling significantly increases the number of positive Papanicolaou smears. Selecting which cervices should be samples ectocervically and which need combined sampling does not significantly improve the yield over ectocervical sampling alone. It is the conclusion of this study that both ectocervical and endocervical sampling should routinely be used.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验