Wanderer Emily Mannix
Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh.
Med Anthropol Q. 2017 Sep;31(3):315-331. doi: 10.1111/maq.12339. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
In the aftermath of the 2009 outbreak of H1N1 influenza, scientists in Mexico sought to develop bioseguridad, that is, to protect biological life in Mexico by safely conducting research on infectious disease. Drawing on ethnographic research in laboratories and with scientists in Mexico, I look at how scientists make claims about local differences in regulations, infrastructure, bodies, and culture. The scientists working with infectious microbes sought to establish how different microbial ecologies, human immune systems, and political and regulatory systems made the risks of research different in Mexico from other countries. In developing bioseguridad, the idea of globalized biology that animates many public health projects was undermined as scientists attended to the elements of place that affected human health and safety. Scientists argued for the importance of local biologies, generating tension with global public health projects and regulations premised on the universality of biology.
在2009年甲型H1N1流感爆发后,墨西哥的科学家们试图发展生物安全,也就是说,通过对传染病进行安全研究来保护墨西哥的生物生命。基于在墨西哥实验室以及与科学家们进行的人种志研究,我考察了科学家们如何就法规、基础设施、人体和文化方面的地方差异提出主张。研究传染性微生物的科学家们试图确定不同的微生物生态、人类免疫系统以及政治和监管系统如何使得墨西哥的研究风险有别于其他国家。在发展生物安全的过程中,随着科学家们关注影响人类健康和安全的地方因素,许多公共卫生项目所秉持的全球化生物学理念受到了冲击。科学家们主张地方生物学的重要性,这与基于生物学普遍性的全球公共卫生项目和法规产生了矛盾。