Suppr超能文献

新电子病历系统的引入对首例手术病例效率指标产生了复杂的影响。

Introduction of a new electronic medical record system has mixed effects on first surgical case efficiency metrics.

作者信息

Wu Albert, Kodali Bhavani S, Flanagan Hugh L, Urman Richard D

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, US.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Oct;31(5):1073-1079. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9933-6. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of deploying a new electronic medical record (EMR) system on first case starts in the operating room. Data on first case start times were collected after implementation of a new EMR (Epic) from June 2015 to May 2016, which replaced a legacy system of both paper and electronic records. These were compared to data from the same months in the three proceeding years. First patient in room (FPIR) on time was true if the patient was in operating room before 7:35 AM (or 9:35 AM on Wednesdays) and first case on time start (FCOTS) was true if completion of anesthetic induction was less than 20 min after the patient entered the operating room (or 35 min for cardiac and neurosurgery). Times beyond these cutoffs were quantified as FPIR and FCOTS delays in minutes. Average delays were compared by month with two-sample t tests and 95 % confidence intervals. There was a significant increase in FPIR delays in the first month (11.07 vs. 3.47 min, p < 0.0001), which abated by the fifth month. Post-implementation FCOTS delays improved by the third month (4.53 vs. 7.10 min, p < 0.0001). Both results persisted throughout the study. First month FPIR delays were not limited to any one specialty. EMRs have the potential to improve hospital workflows, but are not without learning curves. FPIR and FCOTS delays return to baseline after a few months, and in the case of FCOTS, can improve beyond baseline.

摘要

评估部署新的电子病历(EMR)系统对手术室首例手术开始时间的影响。在2015年6月至2016年5月实施新的EMR(Epic)系统后收集首例手术开始时间的数据,该系统取代了纸质和电子记录的旧系统。将这些数据与前三年相同月份的数据进行比较。如果患者在上午7:35之前(或周三上午9:35之前)进入手术室,则首例患者准时进入手术室(FPIR)为真;如果患者进入手术室后麻醉诱导完成时间少于20分钟(心脏和神经外科手术为35分钟),则首例手术准时开始(FCOTS)为真。超过这些临界值的时间以分钟为单位量化为FPIR和FCOTS延迟。每月使用双样本t检验和95%置信区间比较平均延迟。第一个月FPIR延迟显著增加(11.07对3.47分钟,p<0.0001),到第五个月时有所缓解。实施后FCOTS延迟到第三个月有所改善(4.53对7.10分钟,p<0.0001)。这两个结果在整个研究过程中都持续存在。第一个月的FPIR延迟并不局限于任何一个专科。电子病历有改善医院工作流程的潜力,但并非没有学习曲线。FPIR和FCOTS延迟在几个月后恢复到基线水平,就FCOTS而言,甚至可以改善到超过基线水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验