Suppr超能文献

评估 Insight ARTHRO VR(®)关节镜虚拟训练模拟器的方法:表面效度、内容效度和结构效度。

Assessment study of insight ARTHRO VR (®) arthroscopy virtual training simulator: face, content, and construct validities.

机构信息

Dpto. de Arquitectura y Tecnología de Computadores, Ciencias de la Computación e Inteligencia Artificial, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, DATCCCIA D.0054 Ampliación Rectorado, C/Tulipán, S/N, 28933, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Severo Ochoa Leganés, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2008 Sep;2(3):151-8. doi: 10.1007/s11701-008-0101-y. Epub 2008 Aug 21.

Abstract

The aims of this study were to test the face, content, and construct validities of a virtual-reality haptic arthroscopy simulator and to validate four assessment hypothesis. The participants in our study were 94 arthroscopists attending an international conference on arthroscopy. The interviewed surgeons had been performing arthroscopies for a mean of 8.71 years (σ = 6.94 years). We explained the operation, functionality, instructions for use, and the exercises provided by the simulator. They performed a trial exercise and then an exercise in which performance was recorded. After having using it, the arthroscopists answered a questionnaire. The simulator was classified as one of the best training methods (over phantoms), and obtained a mark of 7.10 out of 10 as an evaluation tool. The simulator was considered more useful for inexperienced surgeons than for surgeons with experience (mean difference 1.88 out of 10, P value < 0.001). The participants valued the simulator at 8.24 as a tool for learning skills, its fidelity at 7.41, the quality of the platform at 7.54, and the content of the exercises at 7.09. It obtained a global score of 7.82. Of the subjects, 30.8% said they would practise with the simulator more than 6 h per week. Of the surgeons, 89.4% affirmed that they would recommend the simulator to their colleagues. The data gathered support the first three hypotheses, as well as face and content validities. Results show statistically significant differences between experts and novices, thus supporting the construct validity, but studies with a larger sample must be carried out to verify this. We propose concrete solutions and an equation to calculate economy of movement. Analogously, we analyze competence measurements and propose an equation to provide a single measurement that contains them all and that, according to the surgeons' criteria, is as reliable as the judgment of experts observing the performance of an apprentice.

摘要

本研究的目的是测试虚拟现实触觉关节镜模拟器的表面效度、内容效度和结构效度,并验证四个评估假设。我们的研究对象是参加关节镜国际会议的 94 名关节镜医师。接受采访的外科医生进行关节镜手术的平均时间为 8.71 年(标准差=6.94 年)。我们解释了模拟器的操作、功能、使用说明和提供的练习。他们先进行了一次试用练习,然后进行了一次记录表现的练习。使用完之后,关节镜医师回答了一份问卷。模拟器被评为最佳培训方法之一(优于模型),作为评估工具获得了 10 分中的 7.1 分。与有经验的外科医生相比,模拟器对经验不足的外科医生更有用(平均差异为 10 分中的 1.88 分,P 值<0.001)。参与者将模拟器作为学习技能的工具评为 8.24 分,其逼真度为 7.41 分,平台质量为 7.54 分,练习内容为 7.09 分。总体得分为 7.82 分。30.8%的参与者表示每周将使用模拟器练习超过 6 小时。89.4%的外科医生表示会向同事推荐该模拟器。收集的数据支持前三个假设,以及表面效度和内容效度。结果显示,专家和新手之间存在统计学显著差异,因此支持结构效度,但需要进行更大样本量的研究来验证这一点。我们提出了具体的解决方案和计算运动经济性的方程。类似地,我们分析了能力测量,并提出了一个方程,提供一个包含所有测量的单一测量值,根据外科医生的标准,该测量值与观察学徒表现的专家判断一样可靠。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验