Primrose OB/GYN, Cox Health Systems, 1000 E. Primrose #270, Springfield, MO, 65807, USA.
J Robot Surg. 2012 Jun;6(2):115-23. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0276-5. Epub 2011 May 28.
We aimed to determine whether early hospital discharge following minimally invasive surgery can be achieved through the use of preemptive multimodal analgesia without compromising patient safety or comfort. Data were retrospectively collected for 150 patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications from 9 December 2009 to 6 October 2010 at Cox Health Systems (Springfield, MO, USA). One surgeon performed 100 consecutive cases with all patients receiving preemptive multimodal treatment with celecoxib and ropivacaine. These cases were compared with 50 patients treated with an opioid-based postoperative analgesia regimen by one of four other surgeons at the same center. Patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, opioid requirement, and time to discharge were compared between groups. The patients in the multimodal group had significantly reduced opioid requirements intraoperatively (25.0 mg vs. 29.9 mg, P = 0.0077), postoperatively on the day of surgery (10.9 mg vs. 17.9 mg, P = 0.0030), and on the first postoperative day (3.1 mg vs. 15.3 mg, P = 0.0001). There were no differences in procedure time, transfusions, or readmission rates between groups. Time in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) was decreased in the multimodal group (72.0 min vs. 88.4 min, P < 0.0001), as was time to discharge from the hospital (8.5 h vs. 30.2 h, P < 0.0001). Age and body mass index were both significantly lower in the multimodal group; however, regression analyses demonstrated that analgesia regimen was the only parameter that predicted opioid requirement and time to discharge. Preemptive multimodal analgesia reduced the total dose of rescue opioids, facilitating same-day discharge without compromising patient comfort or safety.
我们旨在确定通过使用预防性多模式镇痛是否可以在不影响患者安全和舒适度的情况下实现微创手术后的早期出院。回顾性收集了 2009 年 12 月 9 日至 2010 年 10 月 6 日在美国密苏里州斯普林菲尔德考克斯健康系统接受机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性疾病的 150 名患者的数据。一位外科医生连续进行了 100 例手术,所有患者均接受塞来昔布和罗哌卡因的预防性多模式治疗。这些病例与在同一中心的四位其他外科医生中的一位使用阿片类药物为基础的术后镇痛方案治疗的 50 例患者进行了比较。比较了两组患者的特征、围手术期结局、阿片类药物需求和出院时间。多模式组患者术中(25.0mg 比 29.9mg,P=0.0077)、术后手术当天(10.9mg 比 17.9mg,P=0.0030)和术后第一天(3.1mg 比 15.3mg,P=0.0001)的阿片类药物需求明显减少。两组患者的手术时间、输血或再入院率无差异。多模式组患者在麻醉后护理病房(PACU)的时间减少(72.0 分钟比 88.4 分钟,P<0.0001),出院时间也缩短(8.5 小时比 30.2 小时,P<0.0001)。多模式组的年龄和体重指数均显著较低;然而,回归分析表明,镇痛方案是唯一预测阿片类药物需求和出院时间的参数。预防性多模式镇痛减少了挽救性阿片类药物的总剂量,实现了当天出院,而不影响患者的舒适度或安全性。