Tan Tony Xing, Jordan-Arthur Brittany, Garafano Jeffrey S, Curran Laura
a Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, College of Education , University of South Florida , Tampa , Florida , USA.
b Department of Psychology , University of South Florida , Tampa , Florida , USA.
J Homosex. 2017;64(8):1033-1051. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2016.1236593. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
We investigated 109 (79.8% female; 76% White, and 83.5% Heterosexual) mental health trainees' explicit and implicit attitudes toward heterosexual, lesbian, and gay White couples adopting and raising Black children. To determine explicit attitudes, we used a vignette depicting a Black child ready for adoption and three types of equally qualified White families who were headed by a heterosexual couple, gay couple, or lesbian couple. The trainees were asked to indicate which type of family they preferred to adopt the child. To determine implicit attitudes, we used the computer programed latency-based multifactor implicit association test (IAT) protocol. The IAT data were collected from each participant individually. Explicit data showed that over 80% of the participants indicated no strong preference in terms of which type of family should adopted the child. However, IAT data showed that the trainees implicitly preferred lesbian couples. Overall, the degree of congruence between explicit and implicit was very low. Implications for training were discussed.
我们调查了109名心理健康专业学员(79.8%为女性;76%为白人,83.5%为异性恋)对异性恋、女同性恋和男同性恋白人夫妇收养和抚养黑人儿童的显性和隐性态度。为了确定显性态度,我们使用了一个描述有一名准备被收养的黑人儿童以及三种同样符合条件的白人家庭的小短文,这三种家庭分别由异性恋夫妇、男同性恋夫妇或女同性恋夫妇领导。学员们被要求指出他们更倾向于哪种类型的家庭收养这个孩子。为了确定隐性态度,我们使用了基于计算机编程潜伏期的多因素内隐联想测验(IAT)协议。IAT数据是从每个参与者单独收集的。显性数据显示,超过80%的参与者表示在哪种类型的家庭收养孩子方面没有强烈的偏好。然而,IAT数据显示,学员们在隐性层面上更倾向于女同性恋夫妇。总体而言,显性和隐性之间的一致程度非常低。文中讨论了对培训的启示。