Sadhu Anita, Nam Denis, Coobs Benjamin R, Barrack Toby N, Nunley Ryan M, Barrack Robert L
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri.
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):987-991. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
Recently, the importance of acetabular component positioning in the Lewinnek "safe zone" in preventing prosthetic dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of acetabular components within the Lewinnek safe zone between primary and revision THAs that have sustained a dislocation vs matched controls without a dislocation event.
This was a retrospective, institutional review board-approved investigation of THAs performed at our institution or referred to our institution between 1997 and 2013. Ninety-six primary THAs and 60 revision THAs that sustained a dislocation were included and matched 1:1 based on age, gender, and body mass index with nondislocated controls. Acetabular component inclination and anteversion were performed using Martell Hip Analysis Suite and compared between the 2 cohorts for both primary and revision THAs.
The proportion of acetabular components within the safe zone for both inclination and anteversion was 23 of 96 (24%) in primary THA dislocators vs 48 of 96 (50%, P < .001) in controls. The proportion of acetabular components within the safe zone for both inclination and anteversion was 28 of 60 (47%) in revision THA dislocators vs 40 of 60 (66%, P = .03) in controls.
Patients sustaining a dislocation following a primary or revision THA had acetabular components less frequently positioned within the safe zone compared to control patients. This study suggests acetabular component positioning remains an important variable in decreasing the risk of dislocation following primary and revision THA.
最近,髋臼组件在全髋关节置换术(THA)后置于Lewinnek“安全区”以防止假体脱位的重要性受到质疑。本研究的目的是确定初次和翻修THA中发生脱位的患者与未发生脱位事件的匹配对照中,髋臼组件位于Lewinnek安全区内的比例。
这是一项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究,对1997年至2013年在本机构进行或转诊至本机构的THA进行调查。纳入96例初次THA和60例翻修THA发生脱位的患者,并根据年龄、性别和体重指数与未脱位的对照进行1:1匹配。使用Martell髋关节分析套件测量髋臼组件的倾斜度和前倾角,并在初次和翻修THA的两组之间进行比较。
初次THA脱位患者中,倾斜度和前倾角均在安全区内的髋臼组件比例为96例中的23例(24%),而对照组为96例中的48例(50%,P <.001)。翻修THA脱位患者中,倾斜度和前倾角均在安全区内的髋臼组件比例为60例中的28例(47%),而对照组为60例中的40例(66%,P =.03)。
与对照患者相比,初次或翻修THA后发生脱位的患者髋臼组件位于安全区内的频率较低。本研究表明,髋臼组件的位置仍然是降低初次和翻修THA后脱位风险的一个重要变量。