• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋臼假体位置与初次及翻修全髋关节置换术后脱位风险:一项配对队列分析

Acetabular Component Position and the Risk of Dislocation Following Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

作者信息

Sadhu Anita, Nam Denis, Coobs Benjamin R, Barrack Toby N, Nunley Ryan M, Barrack Robert L

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):987-991. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.008
PMID:27633947
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, the importance of acetabular component positioning in the Lewinnek "safe zone" in preventing prosthetic dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of acetabular components within the Lewinnek safe zone between primary and revision THAs that have sustained a dislocation vs matched controls without a dislocation event.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, institutional review board-approved investigation of THAs performed at our institution or referred to our institution between 1997 and 2013. Ninety-six primary THAs and 60 revision THAs that sustained a dislocation were included and matched 1:1 based on age, gender, and body mass index with nondislocated controls. Acetabular component inclination and anteversion were performed using Martell Hip Analysis Suite and compared between the 2 cohorts for both primary and revision THAs.

RESULTS

The proportion of acetabular components within the safe zone for both inclination and anteversion was 23 of 96 (24%) in primary THA dislocators vs 48 of 96 (50%, P < .001) in controls. The proportion of acetabular components within the safe zone for both inclination and anteversion was 28 of 60 (47%) in revision THA dislocators vs 40 of 60 (66%, P = .03) in controls.

CONCLUSION

Patients sustaining a dislocation following a primary or revision THA had acetabular components less frequently positioned within the safe zone compared to control patients. This study suggests acetabular component positioning remains an important variable in decreasing the risk of dislocation following primary and revision THA.

摘要

背景

最近,髋臼组件在全髋关节置换术(THA)后置于Lewinnek“安全区”以防止假体脱位的重要性受到质疑。本研究的目的是确定初次和翻修THA中发生脱位的患者与未发生脱位事件的匹配对照中,髋臼组件位于Lewinnek安全区内的比例。

方法

这是一项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究,对1997年至2013年在本机构进行或转诊至本机构的THA进行调查。纳入96例初次THA和60例翻修THA发生脱位的患者,并根据年龄、性别和体重指数与未脱位的对照进行1:1匹配。使用Martell髋关节分析套件测量髋臼组件的倾斜度和前倾角,并在初次和翻修THA的两组之间进行比较。

结果

初次THA脱位患者中,倾斜度和前倾角均在安全区内的髋臼组件比例为96例中的23例(24%),而对照组为96例中的48例(50%,P <.001)。翻修THA脱位患者中,倾斜度和前倾角均在安全区内的髋臼组件比例为60例中的28例(47%),而对照组为60例中的40例(66%,P =.03)。

结论

与对照患者相比,初次或翻修THA后发生脱位的患者髋臼组件位于安全区内的频率较低。本研究表明,髋臼组件的位置仍然是降低初次和翻修THA后脱位风险的一个重要变量。

相似文献

1
Acetabular Component Position and the Risk of Dislocation Following Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis.髋臼假体位置与初次及翻修全髋关节置换术后脱位风险:一项配对队列分析
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):987-991. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
2
What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.什么安全区?绝大多数脱位的全髋关节置换术(THA)髋臼组件位置处于Lewinnek安全区内。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):386-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4432-5.
3
The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.全髋关节置换术中髋臼前倾角的安全区范围比倾斜角的安全区范围更窄。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):325-335. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000051.
4
Adoption of Robotic vs Fluoroscopic Guidance in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is Acetabular Positioning Improved in the Learning Curve?全髋关节置换术中机器人引导与透视引导的应用:在学习曲线中髋臼位置是否得到改善?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.039. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
5
Redefining the 3D Topography of the Acetabular Safe Zone: A Multivariable Study Evaluating Prosthetic Hip Stability.重新定义髋臼安全区的 3D 形态:评估人工髋关节稳定性的多变量研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Feb 2;104(3):239-245. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00406.
6
Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fracture Is Associated With Lower Survivorship and More Complications.髋臼骨折后全髋关节置换术的生存率较低且并发症较多。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):392-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4509-1.
7
Can Surgeons Reduce the Risk for Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Using the Posterolateral Approach?采用后外侧入路进行初次全髋关节置换术后,外科医生能否降低脱位风险?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3141-3146. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.047. Epub 2017 May 4.
8
Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Spinal Deformity Population: Does Degree of Sagittal Deformity Affect Rates of Safe Zone Placement, Instability, or Revision?脊柱畸形患者的全髋关节置换术:矢状面畸形程度是否会影响安全区放置率、不稳定性或翻修率?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1910-1917. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.039. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
9
Redefining the Acetabular Component Safe Zone for Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.重新定义后入路全髋关节置换术中髋臼假体安全区域
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Feb;31(2):506-11. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
10
Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study.机器人辅助与传统髋臼杯置入在全髋关节置换术中的比较:一项配对对照研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):329-36. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3253-7. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning Curves Associated With Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review.机器人全髋关节置换术的学习曲线:一项范围综述
Orthop Surg. 2025 Sep;17(9):2529-2540. doi: 10.1111/os.70130. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
2
Correlation Analysis of Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Coronal Pelvic Obliquity After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Direct Anterior Approach.全髋关节置换术直接前路入路后骨盆冠状面倾斜患者临床结局的相关性分析
Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun;17(6):1769-1781. doi: 10.1111/os.70060. Epub 2025 May 1.
3
How Much Does a Computed Tomography-Based Mixed-Reality Navigation System Change Freehand Acetabular Component Position?
基于计算机断层扫描的混合现实导航系统对徒手髋臼组件位置有多大改变?
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Mar 14;32:101661. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101661. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
A Handheld, Portable Image-Based System May Outperform Computer Navigation or Robotic Platforms in Providing Accurate Acetabular Component Positioning.在提供准确的髋臼假体定位方面,一种基于图像的手持式便携式系统可能比计算机导航或机器人平台表现更优。
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Oct 11;30:101511. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101511. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Lewinnek zone not "the be-all and end-all" functional planning for acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty.Lewinnek 区域并非全髋关节置换术中髋臼组件定位的“终极标准”功能规划。
Arthroplasty. 2025 Jan 6;7(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s42836-024-00284-w.
6
Computer-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Improves Acetabular Prosthesis Placement Accuracy: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.计算机辅助全髋关节置换术可提高髋臼假体放置精度:一项多中心、随机对照临床研究。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Dec;16(12):3078-3087. doi: 10.1111/os.14251. Epub 2024 Sep 29.
7
The Relationship of Cup Inclination and Anteversion in the Coronal Plane with Ante-Inclination in the Sagittal Plane: Exposing the Fallacy of Cup Safe Zones.冠状面杯状倾斜和前倾角与矢状面前倾之间的关系:揭示髋臼杯安全区的谬误
JB JS Open Access. 2024 Jul 11;9(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00120. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
8
The learning curve for robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty in low, medium, and high-volume surgeons.低、中、高手术量外科医生进行机器人辅助全髋关节置换术的学习曲线。
J Orthop. 2024 Apr 18;55:163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.04.011. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
Feasibility and anteversion accuracy of a patient-specific instrument for femoral prosthesis implantation in total hip arthroplasty.患者特异性股骨假体植入工具在全髋关节置换术中的可行性和前倾角准确性。
Biomed Eng Online. 2023 Sep 13;22(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12938-023-01152-5.
10
Is Retention of the Acetabular Component at Revision Surgery a Long-Term Solution?髋臼组件在翻修手术中的保留是一种长期解决方案吗?
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Aug 26;23:101197. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101197. eCollection 2023 Oct.