• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机辅助全髋关节置换术可提高髋臼假体放置精度:一项多中心、随机对照临床研究。

Computer-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Improves Acetabular Prosthesis Placement Accuracy: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2024 Dec;16(12):3078-3087. doi: 10.1111/os.14251. Epub 2024 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1111/os.14251
PMID:39344283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11608766/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The long-term effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) largely depends on the accuracy of acetabular prosthesis placement. To improve the accuracy of acetabular prosthesis placement, we utilized a new surgical navigation system: visual treatment solution (VTS). The purpose of this study was to verify the efficacy and safety of this system in assisting THA.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. One hundred and twenty-four patients undergoing primary THAs were included. The experimental group underwent VTS-assisted THA, and the control group underwent traditional surgical techniques. The main efficacy evaluation indicators were the proportion of anteversion and inclination angles in the Lewinnek safe zone, and secondary evaluation indicators included operation time, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) score, Harris score, short-form-36 (SF-36) score, and hip dislocation rate. Statistical analysis was performed mainly by t-test and chi-square test.

RESULTS

The proportion of both anteversion and inclination angles in the safe zone was 93.1% in the experimental group and 50.9% in the control group; the difference was significant (p < 0.01). The average operation time was 112.5 min in the experimental group and 92.6 min in the control group; the difference was significant (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in WOMAC score, Harris score, or SF-36 score between the experimental and control groups at 3 months after the operation (p > 0.05). The dislocation rate was 0% in the experimental group and 1.6% in the control group; the difference was not significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

VTS-assisted THA can significantly improve the accuracy of acetabular prosthesis placement. However, there were no differences in short-term clinical outcomes or dislocation rates between the two groups.

摘要

目的

全髋关节置换术(THA)的长期效果在很大程度上取决于髋臼假体放置的准确性。为了提高髋臼假体放置的准确性,我们使用了一种新的手术导航系统:视觉治疗解决方案(VTS)。本研究旨在验证该系统辅助 THA 的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验。纳入了 124 例行初次 THA 的患者。实验组采用 VTS 辅助 THA,对照组采用传统手术技术。主要疗效评估指标为前倾角和倾斜角在 Lewinnek 安全区的比例,次要评估指标包括手术时间、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分、Harris 评分、简明 36 健康调查量表(SF-36)评分和髋关节脱位率。统计分析主要采用 t 检验和卡方检验。

结果

实验组前倾角和倾斜角在安全区的比例分别为 93.1%和 50.9%,差异有统计学意义(p<0.01)。实验组手术时间平均为 112.5 分钟,对照组为 92.6 分钟,差异有统计学意义(p<0.01)。术后 3 个月,实验组 WOMAC 评分、Harris 评分和 SF-36 评分与对照组相比差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。实验组脱位率为 0%,对照组为 1.6%,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。

结论

VTS 辅助 THA 可显著提高髋臼假体放置的准确性,但两组在短期临床结果或脱位率方面无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a196/11608766/012e01b121bb/OS-16-3078-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a196/11608766/027431f270b8/OS-16-3078-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a196/11608766/7affae89e6ae/OS-16-3078-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a196/11608766/40a7a23986e1/OS-16-3078-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a196/11608766/012e01b121bb/OS-16-3078-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a196/11608766/027431f270b8/OS-16-3078-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a196/11608766/7affae89e6ae/OS-16-3078-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a196/11608766/40a7a23986e1/OS-16-3078-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a196/11608766/012e01b121bb/OS-16-3078-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Computer-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Improves Acetabular Prosthesis Placement Accuracy: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.计算机辅助全髋关节置换术可提高髋臼假体放置精度:一项多中心、随机对照临床研究。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Dec;16(12):3078-3087. doi: 10.1111/os.14251. Epub 2024 Sep 29.
2
Precise Acetabular Prosthesis Positioning Using a Novel Robot-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty System: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.使用新型机器人辅助全髋关节置换系统进行精确髋臼假体定位:一项多中心随机对照试验
Orthop Surg. 2025 Jan;17(1):141-150. doi: 10.1111/os.14277. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
3
[Application of modified acetabular anteversion and inclination angles test system in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty after lumbar fusion].改良髋臼前倾角与倾斜角测试系统在腰椎融合术后全髋关节置换患者中的应用
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 May 15;38(5):576-582. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202401001.
4
[Comparative study of intra- and post-operative inclination and anteversion angles of acetabular cup in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty].机器人辅助全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯术中及术后倾斜角和前倾角的比较研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 15;35(10):1246-1250. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202107037.
5
No Benefit After THA Performed With Computer-assisted Cup Placement: 10-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Study.计算机辅助髋臼置入全髋关节置换术后无益处:一项随机对照研究的10年结果
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2085-93. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4863-7.
6
Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study.机器人辅助与传统髋臼杯置入在全髋关节置换术中的比较:一项配对对照研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):329-36. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3253-7. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
7
[Accuracy improvement of acetabular component placement using non-image based surgical navigation system].[使用非图像引导手术导航系统提高髋臼假体置入的准确性]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Oct;21(10):1057-61.
8
Computed tomography-based navigation versus accelerometer-based portable navigation in total hip arthroplasty for dysplastic hip osteoarthritis.基于计算机断层扫描的导航与基于加速度计的便携式导航在发育性髋关节骨关节炎全髋关节置换术中的应用比较
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Mar 1;35(1):83. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04188-6.
9
Does a Commercially Available Augmented Reality-based Portable Hip Navigation System Improve Cup Positioning During THA Compared With the Conventional Technique? A Randomized Controlled Study.与传统技术相比,市售的基于增强现实的便携式髋关节导航系统在全髋关节置换术中是否能改善髋臼杯定位?一项随机对照研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Mar 1;482(3):458-467. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002819. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
10
[Computer-assisted surgery for acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: comparative prospective randomized study].[全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯定位的计算机辅助手术:比较性前瞻性随机研究]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 May;93(3):238-46. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)90245-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Acetabular cup positioning in primary routine total hip arthroplasty-a review of current concepts and technologies.初次常规全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯的定位——当前概念与技术综述
Arthroplasty. 2023 Dec 1;5(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00213-3.
2
The Use of Computer Navigation in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated with a Reduced Rate of Revision for Dislocation: A Study of 6,912 Navigated THA Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.计算机导航在全髋关节置换术中的应用与降低脱位翻修率相关:来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的 6912 例导航 THA 手术研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Oct 20;103(20):1900-1905. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00950.
3
Robotics Versus Navigation Versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does the Use of Technology Yield Superior Outcomes?
机器人辅助与导航辅助与传统全髋关节置换术:使用技术是否能产生更好的结果?
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Aug;36(8):2801-2807. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.074. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
4
Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Imageless Computer-Assisted Navigation-2-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Randomized Study.使用无图像计算机辅助导航的全髋关节置换术——一项前瞻性随机研究的2年随访
J Clin Med. 2020 May 27;9(6):1620. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061620.
5
Computer-Assisted Navigation Is Associated with Reductions in the Rates of Dislocation and Acetabular Component Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.计算机辅助导航可降低初次全髋关节置换术后脱位和髋臼部件翻修的发生率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 6;101(3):250-256. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00108.
6
Functional Safe Zone Is Superior to the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Why the Lewinnek Safe Zone Is Not Always Predictive of Stability.功能安全区优于全髋关节置换的 Lewinnek 安全区:Lewinnek 安全区并不总是稳定性预测指标的原因。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.034. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
7
The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.全髋关节置换术中髋臼前倾角的安全区范围比倾斜角的安全区范围更窄。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):325-335. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000051.
8
Prevention of Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后脱位的预防。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1316-1324. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.047. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
9
Precision and accuracy of imageless navigation versus freehand implantation of total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.无影像导航与全髋关节置换术徒手植入的精确性和准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2017 Dec;13(4). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1843. Epub 2017 May 29.
10
Acetabular Component Position and the Risk of Dislocation Following Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis.髋臼假体位置与初次及翻修全髋关节置换术后脱位风险:一项配对队列分析
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):987-991. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 20.