Maher Jaclyn P, Dzubur Eldin, Huh Jimi, Intille Stephen, Dunton Genevieve F
1 University of Southern California.
2 Northeastern University.
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2016 Aug;38(4):423-434. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2016-0058. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
This study used time-varying effect modeling to examine time-of-day differences in how behavioral cognitions predict subsequent physical activity (PA). Adults (N = 116) participated in three 4-day "bursts" of ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Participants were prompted with eight EMA questionnaires per day assessing behavioral cognitions (i.e., intentions, self-efficacy, outcome expectations) and wore an accelerometer during waking hours. Subsequent PA was operationalized as accelerometer-derived minutes of moderate- or vigorousintensity PA in the 2 hr following the EMA prompt. On weekdays, intentions positively predicted subsequent PA in the morning (9:25 a.m.-11:45 a.m.) and in the evening (8:15 p.m.-10:00 p.m.). Self-efficacy positively predicted subsequent PA on weekday evenings (7:35 p.m.-10:00 p.m.). Outcome expectations were unrelated to subsequent PA on weekdays. On weekend days, behavior cognitions and subsequent PA were unrelated regardless of time of day. This study identifies windows of opportunity and vulnerability for motivation-based PA interventions aiming to deliver intervention content within the context of adults' daily lives.
本研究采用时变效应模型,以检验行为认知对后续身体活动(PA)的预测在一天中不同时段的差异。成年人(N = 116)参与了为期三天、每次四天的生态瞬时评估(EMA)“时段”。每天通过八份EMA问卷促使参与者评估行为认知(即意图、自我效能、结果期望),并在清醒时间佩戴加速度计。后续的PA通过加速度计得出的EMA提示后2小时内中等强度或高强度PA的分钟数来衡量。在工作日,意图能正向预测上午(上午9:25 - 11:45)和晚上(晚上8:15 - 10:00)的后续PA。自我效能能正向预测工作日晚上(晚上7:35 - 10:00)的后续PA。结果期望与工作日的后续PA无关。在周末,无论一天中的什么时间,行为认知与后续PA均无关。本研究为基于动机的PA干预确定了机会窗口和易受影响的时段,这些干预旨在在成年人日常生活背景下提供干预内容。