• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties and a latent class analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a pooled dataset of community samples.在社区样本汇总数据集中对12项世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)的心理测量特性及潜在类别分析
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2016 Dec;25(4):243-254. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1523. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
2
Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in people with severe mental disorders in rural Ethiopia.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表在埃塞俄比亚农村重症精神障碍患者中的效度验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 5;15(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0647-3.
3
Why sample selection matters in exploratory factor analysis: implications for the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.为什么样本选择在探索性因素分析中很重要:对世界卫生组织残疾评估量表2.0(12项)的启示
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Mar 11;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0309-5.
4
Validation of the World Health Organization Assessment Schedule II Chinese Traditional Version (WHODAS II CT) in persons with disabilities and chronic illnesses for Chinese population.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版中文版(WHODAS II CT)在中国残疾人和慢性病患者中的效度验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1902-7. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.989336. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
5
Confirmatory factor analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2.0) within the clubhouse model of psychosocial rehabilitation for serious mental illness.12 项世界卫生组织残疾评定量表 2.0(WHODAS-2.0)在心理社会康复会所模式下用于严重精神疾病的验证性因子分析。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2024 Sep;47(3):229-239. doi: 10.1037/prj0000594. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population.WHODAS 2.0 的心理测量学评估及瑞典普通人群残疾的流行率。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Apr 5;7(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00580-0.
7
Measurement invariance of the 12-item self-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 across early and late adolescents in Canada.12项自评式世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS)2.0在加拿大青少年早期和晚期的测量不变性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Sep;45(19):3118-3124. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2118867. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
8
Activity limitation and participation restrictions of breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: psychometric properties and validation of the Chinese version of the WHODAS 2.0.接受化疗的乳腺癌患者的活动受限和参与受限:WHODAS 2.0 中文版的心理测量特性和验证。
Qual Life Res. 2013 May;22(4):897-906. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0212-9. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
9
Validating the 12-item proxy-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in young children with chronic physical illness in Canada.验证 12 项代理管理世界卫生组织残疾评估表(WHODAS)2.0 在加拿大患有慢性身体疾病的幼儿中的有效性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Sep;45(19):3135-3142. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2118868. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
10
Psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability - systematic review.12 项自我管理世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0(WHODAS 2.0)在一般人群和非急性身体原因残疾人群中的心理测量特性 - 系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Mar;43(6):789-794. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1643416. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring social environment factors of inpatients and outpatients with depression in Germany: a cross-sectional study.衡量德国抑郁症住院患者和门诊患者的社会环境因素:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Ment Health. 2025 Apr 3;28(1):e301359. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301359.
2
Efficacy of solution-focused brief therapy versus case management for psychological distress in adolescents and young adults in a community-based youth mental health service in Singapore: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.新加坡社区青少年心理健康服务中聚焦解决短期治疗与个案管理对青少年和青年心理困扰的疗效:一项随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e081603. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081603.
3
The disability profile in primary care may depend on the type of care and pain aspects.初级保健中的残疾情况可能取决于护理类型和疼痛方面。
Rev Saude Publica. 2024 Dec 16;58:52. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005400. eCollection 2024.
4
Health and disability - a multi-group latent class analysis of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 among those with mental and physical health conditions.健康与残疾 - 基于世界卫生组织残疾评估量表 2.0 的多群组潜类分析,研究对象为同时存在心理健康和身体心理健康状况的人群。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jul 27;22(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02273-8.
5
Validation of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in individuals with schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and diabetes in Singapore.在新加坡,对精神分裂症、抑郁症、焦虑症和糖尿病患者使用 12 项世界卫生组织残疾评估量表 2.0 进行验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0294908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294908. eCollection 2023.
6
Longitudinal follow-up of the randomized controlled trial of access to the trauma-focused self-management app PTSD Coach.创伤聚焦自我管理应用程序PTSD Coach使用的随机对照试验的纵向随访
Internet Interv. 2023 Apr 1;32:100618. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100618. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
Examining the Mental Health, Wellbeing, Work Participation and Engagement of Medical Laboratory Professionals in Ontario, Canada: An Exploratory Study.探讨加拿大安大略省医学实验室专业人员的心理健康、幸福感、工作参与度和投入度:一项探索性研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 15;10:876883. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.876883. eCollection 2022.
8
Severity Levels of Disability Among Older Adults in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Results From the Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health (SAGE).低收入和中等收入国家老年人的残疾严重程度:全球老龄化与成人健康研究(SAGE)的结果
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Oct 15;7:562963. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.562963. eCollection 2020.
9
Gender differences in quality of life among community-dwelling older adults in low- and middle-income countries: results from the Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE).中低收入国家社区老年人生活质量的性别差异:来自全球老龄化和成人健康研究(SAGE)的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 28;20(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8212-0.
10
Psychosocial determinants of sustained maternal functional impairment: Longitudinal findings from a pregnancy-birth cohort study in rural Pakistan.社会心理决定因素对产妇持续功能障碍的影响:来自巴基斯坦农村一项妊娠-分娩队列研究的纵向发现。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 19;14(11):e0225163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225163. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
A modified random walk door-to-door recruitment strategy for collecting social and biological data relating to mental health, substance use, addiction, and violence problems in a Canadian community.一种改良的挨家挨户随机走访招募策略,用于收集加拿大某社区中与心理健康、物质使用、成瘾及暴力问题相关的社会和生物学数据。
Int J Alcohol Drug Res. 2013 Jun 9;2(2):7-16. doi: 10.7895/ijadr.v2i2.143.
2
A study of the psychometric properties of 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in a large population of people with chronic musculoskeletal pain.在大量慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者中对12项世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0的心理测量特性进行的研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Feb;31(2):262-272. doi: 10.1177/0269215516631385. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
3
Psychometric properties of the world health organization disability assessment schedule II -12 Item (WHODAS II) in trauma patients.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版-12项(WHODAS II)在创伤患者中的心理测量特性。
Injury. 2016 May;47(5):1104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.046. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
4
Latent variable mixture modeling in psychiatric research--a review and application.精神医学研究中的潜在变量混合模型——综述与应用
Psychol Med. 2016 Feb;46(3):457-67. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002305. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
5
Associations between depression, chronic physical health conditions, and disability in a community sample: A focus on the persistence of depression.社区样本中抑郁症、慢性身体健康状况与残疾之间的关联:关注抑郁症的持续性
J Affect Disord. 2015 Jul 1;179:6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.020. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
6
Does nature have joints worth carving? A discussion of taxometrics, model-based clustering and latent variable mixture modeling.大自然中有值得雕刻的关节吗?关于=taxometrics、基于模型的聚类和潜在变量混合建模的讨论。
Psychol Med. 2015 Mar;45(4):705-15. doi: 10.1017/S003329171400169X. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
7
Disability in anxiety disorders.焦虑障碍中的残疾。
J Affect Disord. 2014 Sep;166:227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 10.
8
Disability in Italian neurosurgical patients: validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule.意大利神经外科患者的残疾情况:世界卫生组织12项残疾评定量表的效度
Int J Rehabil Res. 2014 Sep;37(3):267-70. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000064.
9
Mixture modeling methods for the assessment of normal and abnormal personality, part I: cross-sectional models.人格正常和异常评估的混合建模方法,第一部分:横截面模型。
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(3):256-68. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.845201. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
10
Depressive symptoms in women with physical disabilities: identifying correlates to inform practice.身体残疾女性的抑郁症状:确定相关因素以指导实践。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Dec;94(12):2410-2416. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

在社区样本汇总数据集中对12项世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)的心理测量特性及潜在类别分析

Psychometric properties and a latent class analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a pooled dataset of community samples.

作者信息

MacLeod Melissa A, Tremblay Paul F, Graham Kathryn, Bernards Sharon, Rehm Jürgen, Wells Samantha

机构信息

Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, London, Ontario, Canada.

Region of Waterloo Public Health and Emergency Services, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2016 Dec;25(4):243-254. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1523. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1002/mpr.1523
PMID:27634553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6860311/
Abstract

The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a brief measurement tool used cross-culturally to capture the multi-dimensional nature of disablement through six domains, including: understanding and interacting with the world; moving and getting around; self-care; getting on with people; life activities; and participation in society. Previous psychometric research supports that the WHODAS 2.0 functions as a general factor of disablement. In a pooled dataset from community samples of adults (N = 447) we used confirmatory factor analysis to confirm a one-factor structure. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of individuals based on their patterns of responses. We identified four distinct classes, or patterns of disablement: (1) pervasive disability; (2) physical disability; (3) emotional, cognitive, or interpersonal disability; (4) no/low disability. Convergent validity of the latent class subgroups was found with respect to socio-demographic characteristics, number of days affected by disabilities, stress, mental health, and substance use. These classes offer a simple and meaningful way to classify people with disabilities based on the 12-item WHODAS 2.0. Focusing on individuals with a high probability of being in the first three classes may help guide interventions.

摘要

世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)的12个条目是一种简短的测量工具,用于跨文化研究,通过六个领域来体现残疾的多维度性质,这六个领域包括:理解与融入世界;行动与四处活动;自我照顾;与人相处;生活活动;以及参与社会。先前的心理测量学研究支持WHODAS 2.0可作为残疾的一个综合因素。在一个来自成年人社区样本的合并数据集(N = 447)中,我们使用验证性因素分析来确认单因素结构。潜在类别分析用于根据个体的反应模式识别亚组。我们识别出了四个不同的类别,即残疾模式:(1)广泛性残疾;(2)身体残疾;(3)情感、认知或人际残疾;(4)无/低残疾。在社会人口学特征、受残疾影响的天数、压力、心理健康和物质使用方面,发现了潜在类别亚组的聚合效度。这些类别提供了一种基于WHODAS 2.0的12个条目对残疾人进行分类的简单而有意义的方法。关注前三类中可能性较高的个体可能有助于指导干预措施。