Suppr超能文献

根系的分支模式:单子叶植物和双子叶植物的比较

Branching patterns of root systems: comparison of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous species.

作者信息

Pagès Loïc

机构信息

INRA, Centre PACA, UR 1115 PSH, Domaine Saint-Paul, Site Agroparc, 84914 Avignon cedex 9, France

出版信息

Ann Bot. 2016 Dec;118(7):1337-1346. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw185. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acropetal root branching is a major process which increases the number of growing tips and distributes their growth potential within the whole root system.

METHODS

Using a method presented in a recent paper, the defined branching traits were estimated in 140 different species, and the branching patterns of monocots (45 species) and dicots (95 species) were compared.

KEY RESULTS

It was checked that the method also applied to monocots (not considered in the previous paper), and that all traits could be estimated in each species. Variations of most traits were even larger for monocots than for dicots. Systematic differences appeared between these two groups: monocots tended to have a larger range in apical diameters (stronger heterorhizy), with both finer and thicker roots; the diameters of their lateral roots were also more variable; their roots exerted a stronger dominance over lateral branches. Altogether, species exhibited two main dependencies among their traits that were illustrated using two axes: (1) the 'fineness-density' axis separated the species which develop very fine roots and branch densely, from species without fine roots which space out their branches; and (2) the 'dominance-heterorhizy' axis separated the species according to the range in their apical diameter which was positively correlated to the level of dominance of mother roots over their branches. Both axes and correlations were remarkably similar for monocots and dicots.

CONCLUSIONS

Beyond the overall typology, this study went on to validate the phenotyping method in Natura, and showed its potential to characterize the differences in groups of species.

摘要

背景与目的

向顶式根分支是一个主要过程,它增加了生长尖端的数量,并在整个根系中分配其生长潜力。

方法

使用最近一篇论文中提出的方法,在140个不同物种中估计了定义的分支性状,并比较了单子叶植物(45种)和双子叶植物(95种)的分支模式。

关键结果

验证了该方法也适用于单子叶植物(先前论文未涉及),并且可以在每个物种中估计所有性状。单子叶植物大多数性状的变异甚至比双子叶植物更大。这两组植物之间出现了系统差异:单子叶植物的根尖直径范围往往更大(异根性更强),有更细和更粗的根;它们侧根的直径也更具变异性;它们的根对侧枝的主导作用更强。总体而言,物种在其性状之间表现出两种主要的相关性,用两个轴来表示:(1)“细密度”轴将那些长出非常细的根且分支密集的物种,与没有细根且分支间隔较大的物种区分开来;(2)“主导-异根性”轴根据根尖直径范围对物种进行区分,根尖直径范围与母根对其分支的主导水平呈正相关。单子叶植物和双子叶植物的这两个轴和相关性非常相似。

结论

除了总体类型学之外,本研究继续验证了在自然环境中的表型分析方法,并展示了其表征物种组差异的潜力。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Plant phenotyping: from bean weighing to image analysis.植物表型分析:从豆荚称重到图像分析。
Plant Methods. 2015 Mar 4;11:14. doi: 10.1186/s13007-015-0056-8. eCollection 2015.
9
Links between root developmental traits and foraging performance.根系发育特征与觅食表现之间的联系。
Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Oct;34(10):1749-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02371.x. Epub 2011 Jun 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验