• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的恢复

Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Capogrosso Paolo, Sanchez-Salas Rafael, Salonia Andrea, Cathala Nathalie, Mombet Annick, Sivaraman Arjun, Barret Eric, Montorsi Francesco, Cathelineau Xavier

机构信息

a Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele , Milan , Italy.

b Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI , IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele , Milan , Italy.

出版信息

Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016 Oct;16(10):1039-52. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2016.1233818. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1080/14737140.2016.1233818
PMID:27636115
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the era of minimally-invasive surgery, urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP) still represents a troublesome issue for a considerable rate of patients. Factors associated with the risk of post-RP UI, need to be carefully assessed throughout the overall clinical management process thus including the pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative setting.

AREAS COVERED

This review analyses current published evidences regarding clinical and surgical aspects associated with urinary continence (UC) recovery after RP. A careful evaluation of patient's clinical characteristics should be carried out before surgery in order to properly counsel the patients regarding the risk of UI. In the last two decades, the advent of robotic surgery has led to an overall improvement of functional outcomes after RP, thanks to the development of different surgical strategies based on either the 'preservation' or the 'reconstruction' of the anatomical elements responsible for urinary continence. Finally, several therapeutic strategies including either a conservative approach, or pharmacological and surgical treatments, should be carefully considered for the post-operative management of UI. Expert commentary: A comprehensive pre-operative patient's clinical assessment, along with a proper and well-conducted surgical procedure and an effective post-operative care management are essential element to achieve a high probability of UC recovery.

摘要

引言

在微创手术时代,根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁(UI)对相当一部分患者来说仍是一个棘手的问题。在整个临床管理过程中,包括术前、术中和术后阶段,都需要仔细评估与根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁风险相关的因素。

涵盖领域

本综述分析了目前已发表的有关根治性前列腺切除术后尿控(UC)恢复相关临床和手术方面的证据。术前应仔细评估患者的临床特征,以便就尿失禁风险向患者提供适当的咨询。在过去二十年中,机器人手术的出现使根治性前列腺切除术后的功能结局总体得到改善,这得益于基于负责尿控的解剖结构“保留”或“重建”的不同手术策略的发展。最后,对于尿失禁的术后管理,应仔细考虑包括保守治疗、药物治疗和手术治疗在内的多种治疗策略。专家评论:全面的术前患者临床评估、恰当且实施良好的手术操作以及有效的术后护理管理是实现高尿控恢复概率的关键要素。

相似文献

1
Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的恢复
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016 Oct;16(10):1039-52. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2016.1233818. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
2
Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery.根治性前列腺切除术后神经血管束的保留程度与术后 1 年的尿控情况。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):559-68. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
3
Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.在根治性前列腺切除术中采用神经保留方法与术后尿控恢复率密切相关。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):717-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11315.x. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
4
[Functional results and treatment of functional dysfunctions after radical prostatectomy].[根治性前列腺切除术后功能障碍的功能结果与治疗]
Prog Urol. 2015 Nov;25(15):1028-66. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2015.07.013.
5
Endopelvic fascia preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does it affect urinary incontinence?机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中保留盆腔内筋膜:是否会影响尿失禁?
Scand J Urol. 2014 Dec;48(6):506-12. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.913259. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
6
Quantitative assessment of fascia preservation improves the prediction of membranous urethral length and inner levator distance on continence outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.定量评估筋膜保留情况可提高机器人辅助前列腺根治术后控尿效果中对膜部尿道长度和内收肌距离的预测能力。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jan;37(1):417-425. doi: 10.1002/nau.23318. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
7
Current techniques to improve outcomes for early return of urinary continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.改善机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后早期恢复尿失禁结局的当前技术。
Fukushima J Med Sci. 2014;60(1):1-13. doi: 10.5387/fms.2013-25. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
8
Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: association with urethral length and urethral fibrosis measured by preoperative and postoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging.根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的恢复:与术前和术后直肠内磁共振成像测量的尿道长度及尿道纤维化的关系
Eur Urol. 2009 Mar;55(3):629-37. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.057. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
9
How to Prevent and Manage Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Review.如何预防和处理前列腺切除术后尿失禁:综述
World J Mens Health. 2021 Oct;39(4):581-597. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200114. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
10
Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.与经耻骨后开放前列腺切除术相比,双侧神经保留机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与更快的控尿恢复相关,但与勃起功能恢复无关:需要准确选择患者。
Oncol Rep. 2013 Jun;29(6):2445-50. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2365. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of perioperative and functional outcomes of single-incision versus standard multi-incision robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomized trial.单切口与标准多切口机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期及功能结局比较:一项前瞻性、对照、非随机试验
J Robot Surg. 2024 May 3;18(1):195. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01962-2.
2
How to Prevent and Manage Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Review.如何预防和处理前列腺切除术后尿失禁:综述
World J Mens Health. 2021 Oct;39(4):581-597. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200114. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
3
Orgasmic Dysfunction after Radical Prostatectomy.
前列腺癌根治术后的性高潮功能障碍
World J Mens Health. 2017 Apr;35(1):1-13. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.2017.35.1.1.