• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[无主诉男孩的包皮不能上翻:包皮环切术的指征?]

[Nonretractable foreskin in boys without complaints : An indication for circumcision?].

作者信息

Eckert K, Janssen N, Franz M, Liedgens P

机构信息

Klinik für Kinderchirurgie, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Essen, Klara-Kopp-Weg 1, 45138, Essen, Deutschland.

Praxis für Kinderchirurgie, Essen, Deutschland.

出版信息

Urologe A. 2017 Mar;56(3):351-357. doi: 10.1007/s00120-016-0232-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00120-016-0232-0
PMID:27637182
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Removing boys' foreskins, even for medical reasons, is increasingly and critically discussed. The aim of this study is to retrospectively verify if the indication for the removal of boys' foreskins was justified. The study is based on the records of boys who underwent preputial operation in an outpatient medical office for pediatric surgery.

METHODS

Preoperative clinical findings, complaints, applied conservative and/or surgical procedures and histological results of the resected foreskins of boys, who underwent preputial operation between 2013-2015, were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 176 boys (age 5 on average) underwent a preputial operation. In 85 % of the cases it was completely removed. Most frequent clinical findings (80 %) were that the prepuce was simply not retractable. 86 % of the boys were free of complaints. The most frequent histological findings were a discrete to moderately pronounced chronic fibrous posthitis (69 %) and subepithelial fibrosis (18 %), In the first case 78 % of the boys had been free of complaints, in the latter 72 %.

CONCLUSION

The majority of the treated boys were free of complaints; however, most of them underwent a complete removal of their foreskin simply because it was nonretractable. The foreskin represents the most sensitive part of the male genital, preputiolysis is a natural process that can go on until early adolescence. Irreversible surgical procedures, such as a complete foreskin removal, should thus be restricted to a clear medical indication.

摘要

背景

切除男孩的包皮,即使是出于医学原因,也越来越受到批判性讨论。本研究的目的是回顾性验证切除男孩包皮的指征是否合理。该研究基于在儿科外科门诊接受包皮环切手术的男孩的记录。

方法

回顾性分析2013年至2015年间接受包皮环切手术的男孩的术前临床检查结果、主诉、应用的保守和/或手术方法以及切除包皮的组织学结果。

结果

共有176名男孩(平均年龄5岁)接受了包皮环切手术。其中85%的病例包皮被完全切除。最常见的临床检查结果(80%)是包皮单纯不能上翻。86%的男孩无主诉。最常见的组织学检查结果是轻度至中度慢性纤维性阴茎头炎(69%)和上皮下纤维化(18%),在第一种情况中78%的男孩无主诉,在第二种情况中72%的男孩无主诉。

结论

大多数接受治疗的男孩无主诉;然而,他们中的大多数仅仅因为包皮不能上翻就接受了包皮完全切除术。包皮是男性生殖器最敏感的部分,包皮松解是一个自然过程,可以持续到青春期早期。因此,不可逆的手术操作,如完全切除包皮,应仅限于明确的医学指征。

相似文献

1
[Nonretractable foreskin in boys without complaints : An indication for circumcision?].[无主诉男孩的包皮不能上翻:包皮环切术的指征?]
Urologe A. 2017 Mar;56(3):351-357. doi: 10.1007/s00120-016-0232-0.
2
Foreskin Morbidity in Uncircumcised Males.未割包皮男性的包皮病损。
Pediatrics. 2016 May;137(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4340. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
3
Retractable foreskin reduces urinary tract infections in infant boys with vesicoureteral reflux.可回缩包皮可降低患有膀胱输尿管反流的男婴的尿路感染发生率。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Apr;17(2):209.e1-209.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
4
Prepuce sparing: Use of Z-plasty for treatment of phimosis and scarred foreskin.保留包皮:Z 成形术在治疗包茎和瘢痕性包皮过长中的应用。
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Dec;14(6):545.e1-545.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.031. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
5
[Prepuce in boys and adolescents: what when, and how?].[男孩和青少年的包皮:何时、为何以及如何处理?]
Med Pregl. 2012 Jul-Aug;65(7-8):295-300. doi: 10.2298/mpns1208295d.
6
Histopathological examination of the prepuce after circumcision: Is it a waste of resources?包皮环切术后包皮的组织病理学检查:这是资源浪费吗?
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2013 Apr-Jun;10(2):164-6. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.115045.
7
[Review of clinical experience for a new preputioplasty technique as circumcision alternative].[一种新型包皮成形术技术作为包皮环切术替代方法的临床经验回顾]
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2016 Feb;61(1):23-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
8
Referrals from primary care with foreskin symptoms: Room for improvement.基层医疗中因包皮症状进行的转诊:仍有改进空间。
J Pediatr Surg. 2023 Feb;58(2):266-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.10.046. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
9
Preputial variability and preferential association of long phimotic foreskins with penile cancer: an anatomic comparative study of types of foreskin in a general population and cancer patients.包皮变异性及长包茎包皮与阴茎癌的优先关联:普通人群和癌症患者包皮类型的解剖学比较研究
Am J Surg Pathol. 2003 Jul;27(7):994-8. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200307000-00015.
10
Prevalence of phimosis and foreskin sliding abnormalities in male adolescents and their correlation with later onset of first sexual intercourse.男性青少年包茎和包皮滑动异常的患病率及其与首次性行为较晚开始的相关性。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2017 Dec 31;89(4):310-312. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2017.4.310.

引用本文的文献

1
Circumcision and its alternatives in Germany: an analysis of nationwide hospital routine data.在德国,割礼及其替代方法:对全国医院常规数据的分析。
BMC Urol. 2021 Mar 7;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00804-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Terminal innervation of the male genitalia, cutaneous sensory receptors of the male foreskin.男性生殖器的终末神经支配,男性包皮的皮肤感觉感受器。
Clin Anat. 2015 Apr;28(3):385-91. doi: 10.1002/ca.22501. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
2
Ritual circumcision and risk of autism spectrum disorder in 0- to 9-year-old boys: national cohort study in Denmark.0至9岁男孩的仪式性割礼与自闭症谱系障碍风险:丹麦全国队列研究
J R Soc Med. 2015 Jul;108(7):266-79. doi: 10.1177/0141076814565942. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
3
Effect of topical steroid (0.05% clobetasol propionate) treatment in children with severe phimosis.
外用类固醇(0.05%丙酸氯倍他索)治疗小儿重度包茎的效果
Korean J Urol. 2013 Sep;54(9):624-30. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.9.624. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
4
Complication rate after circumcision in a paediatric surgical setting should not be neglected.小儿外科环境下包皮环切术后的并发症发生率不容忽视。
Dan Med J. 2013 Aug;60(8):A4681.
5
Histopathological examination of the prepuce after circumcision: Is it a waste of resources?包皮环切术后包皮的组织病理学检查:这是资源浪费吗?
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2013 Apr-Jun;10(2):164-6. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.115045.
6
Effects of circumcision on male sexual functions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.包皮环切术对男性性功能的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asian J Androl. 2013 Sep;15(5):662-6. doi: 10.1038/aja.2013.47. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
7
Cultural bias in the AAP's 2012 Technical Report and Policy Statement on male circumcision.美国儿科学会 2012 年关于男性割礼的技术报告和政策声明中的文化偏见。
Pediatrics. 2013 Apr;131(4):796-800. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2896. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
8
Routine neonatal circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infections in infancy.常规新生儿包皮环切术预防婴儿期尿路感染
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD009129. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009129.pub2.
9
Dermatopathology of the foreskin: an institutional experience of over 400 cases.包皮的皮肤病理学:超过400例的机构经验。
J Cutan Pathol. 2013 Jan;40(1):11-8. doi: 10.1111/cup.12032. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
10
[Phimosis].[包茎]
Urologe A. 2012 Jul;51(7):1005-16. doi: 10.1007/s00120-012-2942-2.