• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准化的手术技术和专门的手术室环境可以减少机器人辅助盆底疾病手术的手术时间。

Standardized surgical technique and dedicated operating room environment can reduce the operative time during robotic-assisted surgery for pelvic floor disorders.

作者信息

Mantoo Surendra, Rigaud Jerome, Naulet Sophie, Lehur Paul-Antoine, Meurette Guillaume

机构信息

Clinique de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (IMAD), University Hospital of Nantes, Hotel Dieu 1, Place Alexis Ricordeau, 44093, Nantes, France.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2014 Mar;8(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s11701-013-0411-6. Epub 2013 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-013-0411-6
PMID:27637232
Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery for pelvic floor disorders (PFD) meets the accepted standards for laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the technique and the impact of this standardized surgical technique and dedicated operating teams on the operative time for robotic-assisted laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (RALVMR). Data from a prospective database were extracted for all patients who underwent RALVMR between January 2008 and May 2012 for multi-compartment PFD. Patient pre-, intra- and early postoperative data were analysed. To evaluate the impact of both the surgical technique and operating room team on operative time over successive years, we divided the total operation time (TOT) into robot set-up time (RST) and surgeon console time (SCT) including disembarking robotic arms and closure of wounds. A total of 51 patients (3 male) with a mean age of 61.1 [±11, standard deviation (SD)] years were included for analysis. There were no major complications or deaths. Median TOT fell significantly by 23 % from 2008 (270 min) to 2012 (179 min) (p < 0.0001). The largest reduction (>60 %) was seen in RST, from 55 (SD ±3) to 21 (SD ±2) min (p < 0.0001). Similarly, SCT was reduced by 36 % from 216 (SD ±12) to 138 (SD ±8) min (p < 0.0001). Decreased operative time and efficiency were facilitated by a devoted, well-trained and consistent team. A standardized surgical technique for PFD helps to reduce the duration of the surgical procedure.

摘要

机器人辅助手术治疗盆底功能障碍(PFD)符合腹腔镜手术的公认标准。本研究的目的是描述这种标准化手术技术及专业手术团队对机器人辅助腹腔镜腹侧补片直肠固定术(RALVMR)手术时间的影响。我们从一个前瞻性数据库中提取了2008年1月至2012年5月期间因多部位PFD接受RALVMR治疗的所有患者的数据。对患者术前、术中和术后早期的数据进行了分析。为了评估连续多年手术技术和手术室团队对手术时间的影响,我们将总手术时间(TOT)分为机器人设置时间(RST)和外科医生控制台操作时间(SCT),后者包括卸下机器人手臂和关闭伤口的时间。共有51例患者(3例男性)纳入分析,平均年龄为61.1[±11,标准差(SD)]岁。未发生重大并发症或死亡。TOT中位数从2008年的270分钟显著下降23%至2012年的179分钟(p<0.0001)。RST下降幅度最大(>60%),从55(SD±3)分钟降至21(SD±2)分钟(p<0.0001)。同样,SCT从216(SD±12)分钟减少36%至138(SD±8)分钟(p<0.0001)。一个专业、训练有素且稳定的团队有助于缩短手术时间并提高效率。PFD的标准化手术技术有助于缩短手术过程持续时间。

相似文献

1
Standardized surgical technique and dedicated operating room environment can reduce the operative time during robotic-assisted surgery for pelvic floor disorders.标准化的手术技术和专门的手术室环境可以减少机器人辅助盆底疾病手术的手术时间。
J Robot Surg. 2014 Mar;8(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s11701-013-0411-6. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
2
Is robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy superior to laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of obstructed defaecation?机器人辅助腹侧网片直肠固定术在治疗梗阻性排便困难方面优于腹腔镜腹侧网片直肠固定术吗?
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Aug;15(8):e469-75. doi: 10.1111/codi.12251.
3
Robot-assisted Sistrunk's operation, total thyroidectomy, and neck dissection via a transaxillary and retroauricular (TARA) approach in papillary carcinoma arising in thyroglossal duct cyst and thyroid gland.经腋后(TARA)入路机器人辅助施行 Sistrunk 手术、甲状腺全切除术和颈淋巴结清扫术治疗甲状舌管囊肿和甲状腺起源的乳头状癌
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4259-61. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2674-y. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
4
Robotic sacrocolpoperineopexy with ventral rectopexy for the combined treatment of rectal and pelvic organ prolapse: initial report and technique.机器人辅助骶骨阴道会阴固定术联合腹侧直肠固定术治疗直肠和盆腔器官脱垂:初步报告及技术
J Robot Surg. 2011 Sep;5(3):167-73. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0257-8. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
5
Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.经肛门入路机器人辅助吻合术联合或不联合经肛门内外括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌:先经肛门入路,再行机器人手术。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):154-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1952-4. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
6
Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external or internal rectal prolapse and enterocele: a randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助与腹腔镜直肠固定术治疗直肠内脱垂或外脱垂及肠膨出:一项随机对照试验
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Oct;18(10):1010-1015. doi: 10.1111/codi.13309.
7
Anatomical and functional changes to the pelvic floor after robotic versus laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a randomised study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下腹直肠固定术后盆底的解剖学和功能变化:一项随机研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Dec;27(12):1837-1845. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3048-y. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
8
Robotic total thyroidectomy with modified radical neck dissection via unilateral retroauricular approach.经单侧耳后入路机器人辅助全甲状腺切除术并改良根治性颈清扫术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;21(12):3872-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3896-y. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
9
An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.既往腹腔镜子宫切除术经验对机器人辅助子宫切除术学习曲线影响的分析
J Robot Surg. 2013 Sep;7(3):295-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0388-6. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
10
Day case robotic ventral rectopexy compared with day case laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a prospective study.日间手术机器人腹直肌固定术与日间手术腹腔镜腹直肌固定术的比较:一项前瞻性研究
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Oct;20(10):695-700. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1518-3. Epub 2016 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The COMPARE Study: Comparing Perioperative Outcomes of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic, da Vinci Robotic, and Open Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Evidence.COMPARE研究:比较肿瘤微创腹腔镜手术、达芬奇机器人手术和开放手术的围手术期结局:证据的系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Surg. 2025 May 1;281(5):748-763. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006572. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
2
European Society of Coloproctology guideline on training in robotic colorectal surgery (2024).欧洲结直肠外科学会机器人结直肠手术培训指南(2024年)
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr;26(4):776-801. doi: 10.1111/codi.16904. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences.微创顶端骶骨固定术:腹腔镜和机器人手术室经验的回顾性分析
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar-Apr;18(2):122-6. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31824a3995.
2
Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review.评估机器人在泌尿外科手术中的成本效益——系统评价。
BJU Int. 2012 Nov;110(10):1544-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11015.x. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
3
A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery.
Technical modifications for cost optimization in robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy: an initial experience.
机器人辅助腹侧网片直肠固定术的成本优化技术改良:初步经验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Jul;27(7):551-557. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02756-8. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
4
Factors Predicting Operating Room Time in Ureteroscopy and Ureterorenoscopy.输尿管镜检查和输尿管肾镜检查中手术室时间的预测因素
Curr Urol. 2019 Jul;12(4):195-200. doi: 10.1159/000499306. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
5
Efficacy of robotic versus open transversus abdominis release in a porcine model.机器人与开放腹横肌释放术治疗猪模型的疗效比较。
Hernia. 2019 Feb;23(1):29-35. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1836-7. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
6
Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-institution experience.机器人辅助经腹会阴直肠固定术治疗直肠脱垂:单中心经验
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Aug;21(8):667-671. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1675-z. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
直肠癌全系膜切除加自主神经保留术后排尿和性功能的对比研究:腹腔镜与机器人手术比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Aug;19(8):2485-93. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2262-1. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
4
Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes.机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术前后的盆底功能:一年的结果。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):322-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.01.008. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic rectopexy for complex rectocele: a prospective comparison of short-term outcomes.机器人与腹腔镜直肠固定术治疗复杂直肠前突:短期疗效的前瞻性比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Mar;54(3):342-6. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f4737e.
6
Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery.观察性研究的荟萃分析:机器人妇科手术的安全性和有效性。
Br J Surg. 2010 Dec;97(12):1772-83. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7269.
7
Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术中的人体工程学
J Minim Access Surg. 2010 Apr;6(2):31-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.65161.
8
Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.达芬奇手术系统与腹腔镜在腹部手术中的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):254-62. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e6239e.
9
Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study.直肠脱垂开放手术与传统腹腔镜手术及机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠固定术的复发率和功能结果:一项病例对照研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Oct;24(10):1201-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0766-3. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
10
Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve.机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术:技术和学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Oct;23(10):2390-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0311-4. Epub 2009 Jan 27.