Spillane Jeffrey, Brooks Paula
Cape Cod Healthcare, Hyannis, MA, USA.
J Robot Surg. 2014 Sep;8(3):213-20. doi: 10.1007/s11701-014-0453-4. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
This study aimed to elucidate the stepwise progression of robotic skills required, the natural progression from thoracoscopic to robotic technique with a focus on approaching the hilar structures, and the nuances of perioperative care, in a community hospital and solo surgeon practice. It was a case-control analysis comparing 22 consecutive robotic-assisted lobectomy (RAL) procedures with 22 matched historic video-assisted lobectomy (VAL) procedures from June 2011 to December 2012. Patients undergoing VAL had 1.09 days greater length of stay than did patients who underwent RAL. Although hospital charges were significantly higher for RAL patients, patients undergoing VAL had greater blood loss, required longer hospital stay, had greater readmission rates, and were transferred more often to a rehabilitation facility at discharge. Subjectively, dexterity, ergonomics, and optics with the RALs were superior to the VALs. Favorable outcomes were demonstrated for patients undergoing RALs. Effective communication is paramount for the skill set and team building for a safe transition to practice.
本研究旨在阐明在一家社区医院及由一名外科医生开展的手术中,所需机器人技术的逐步进展情况、从胸腔镜技术到机器人技术的自然进展情况(重点关注肺门结构的处理)以及围手术期护理的细微差别。这是一项病例对照分析,比较了2011年6月至2012年12月期间连续进行的22例机器人辅助肺叶切除术(RAL)与22例匹配的历史视频辅助肺叶切除术(VAL)。接受VAL的患者住院时间比接受RAL的患者长1.09天。虽然RAL患者的住院费用显著更高,但接受VAL的患者失血更多、住院时间更长、再入院率更高,出院时更频繁地被转至康复机构。主观上,RAL的灵活性、人体工程学和视觉效果优于VAL。接受RAL的患者显示出良好的预后。有效的沟通对于安全过渡到实际操作所需的技能组合和团队建设至关重要。