• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从学生和毕业生的角度,运用CIPP模型对德黑兰医科大学的部分学院进行评估。

Evaluation of selected faculties at Tehran University of Medical Sciences using CIPP model in students and graduates point of view.

作者信息

Neyazi Narges, Arab Prof Mohammad, Farzianpour Freshteh, Mahmoudi Majdabadi Mahmood

机构信息

Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Health Economics and Management, School of Public Health, Tehran 0098, Iran.

Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Health Economics and Management, School of Public Health, Tehran 0098, Iran.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2016 Dec;59:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.013
PMID:27639657
Abstract

Evaluation of higher education is an increasing demand for information on academic quality, which contributes to accountability among authorities and affects universities ranking. In educational institutions, the purpose of education is producing knowledgeable students and improving quality of the university system. Among many evaluation models, the CIPP model or Context, Input, Process, Product model is very beneficial and recommendable method to educational evaluation. This is a descriptive study conducted in four selected faculties of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) (Public health, Nursing and Midwifery, Rehabilitation and Allied Medical Sciences), undergraduate educational departments in 2014. This research found out quality level of undergraduates courses in viewpoint of students and graduates and determined their weak points. Data were collected through researcher- made questionnaires. Collected data were then analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results showed undesirable situation of context, process and product area and undesirable situation for input except for "interest and understanding of students towards field and labor market" factor, which had relatively desirable situation. At the end, researchers recommend some steps to improve goals and mission of programs, allocated budget, curriculum and providing a system for communication with graduates.

摘要

高等教育评估对学术质量信息的需求日益增加,这有助于当局问责并影响大学排名。在教育机构中,教育的目的是培养有知识的学生并提高大学系统的质量。在众多评估模型中,CIPP模型即背景、投入、过程、产出模型是教育评估中非常有益且值得推荐的方法。这是一项于2014年在德黑兰医科大学(TUMS)四个选定学院(公共卫生、护理与助产学、康复与联合医学科学)的本科教育部门进行的描述性研究。本研究从学生和毕业生的角度找出本科课程的质量水平并确定其薄弱环节。数据通过研究者自制的问卷收集。然后使用描述性和推断性统计对收集到的数据进行分析。结果显示,背景、过程和产出领域情况不佳,投入方面除了“学生对专业和劳动力市场的兴趣与理解”因素情况相对较好外,其他方面情况也不佳。最后,研究者建议采取一些措施来改进项目的目标和使命、分配预算、课程设置以及建立与毕业生沟通的系统。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of selected faculties at Tehran University of Medical Sciences using CIPP model in students and graduates point of view.从学生和毕业生的角度,运用CIPP模型对德黑兰医科大学的部分学院进行评估。
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Dec;59:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
2
Identifying weaknesses in undergraduate programs within the context input process product model framework in view of faculty and library staff in 2014.2014年,从教师和图书馆工作人员的角度,在情境-输入-过程-产品模型框架内识别本科课程中的薄弱环节。
Korean J Med Educ. 2016 Jun;28(2):185-94. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2016.29. Epub 2016 May 27.
3
Program evaluation of an Integrated Basic Science Medical Curriculum in Shiraz Medical School, Using CIPP Evaluation Model.使用CIPP评估模型对设拉子医学院综合基础科学医学课程进行项目评估。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017 Jul;5(3):148-154.
4
Evaluation of the doctoral program in medical education of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences based on the CIPP model.基于CIPP模型对伊斯法罕医科大学医学教育博士项目的评估
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Jul 29;11:217. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_536_21. eCollection 2022.
5
Review evaluation indicators of health information technology course of master's degree in medical sciences universities' based on CIPP Model.基于CIPP模型的医科大学硕士学位健康信息技术课程评价指标研究
J Educ Health Promot. 2015 Mar 27;4:28. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.154122. eCollection 2015.
6
The evaluation of reproductive health PhD program in Iran: The input indicators analysis.伊朗生殖健康博士项目评估:投入指标分析
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014 Nov;19(6):620-8.
7
Basic educational needs of midwifery students for taking the role of an assistance in disaster situations: A cross-sectional study in Iran.助产专业学生在灾难情况下承担协助角色的基本教育需求:伊朗的一项横断面研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Apr;51:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
8
A comparative study of the curriculum in master degree of medical education in Iran and some selected countries.伊朗与部分选定国家医学教育硕士学位课程的比较研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 30;23(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04366-2.
9
Undergraduate medical education programme renewal: a longitudinal context, input, process and product evaluation study.本科医学教育项目更新:一项纵向的背景、投入、过程与成果评估研究。
Perspect Med Educ. 2016 Feb;5(1):15-23. doi: 10.1007/s40037-015-0243-3.
10
Evaluating teaching effectiveness in nursing education: an Iranian perspective.评估护理教育中的教学效果:伊朗视角
BMC Med Educ. 2005 Jul 27;5:29. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-5-29.

引用本文的文献

1
Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model in medical education: A systematic review.医学教育中的情境、输入、过程与产品评估模型:一项系统综述。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 May 31;10(1):199. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1115_20. eCollection 2021.
2
How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education.如何在医学健康教育中执行情境、输入、过程和产品评估模型。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:40. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.40. Epub 2019 Dec 28.