Neyazi Narges, Arab Prof Mohammad, Farzianpour Freshteh, Mahmoudi Majdabadi Mahmood
Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Health Economics and Management, School of Public Health, Tehran 0098, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Health Economics and Management, School of Public Health, Tehran 0098, Iran.
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Dec;59:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
Evaluation of higher education is an increasing demand for information on academic quality, which contributes to accountability among authorities and affects universities ranking. In educational institutions, the purpose of education is producing knowledgeable students and improving quality of the university system. Among many evaluation models, the CIPP model or Context, Input, Process, Product model is very beneficial and recommendable method to educational evaluation. This is a descriptive study conducted in four selected faculties of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) (Public health, Nursing and Midwifery, Rehabilitation and Allied Medical Sciences), undergraduate educational departments in 2014. This research found out quality level of undergraduates courses in viewpoint of students and graduates and determined their weak points. Data were collected through researcher- made questionnaires. Collected data were then analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results showed undesirable situation of context, process and product area and undesirable situation for input except for "interest and understanding of students towards field and labor market" factor, which had relatively desirable situation. At the end, researchers recommend some steps to improve goals and mission of programs, allocated budget, curriculum and providing a system for communication with graduates.
高等教育评估对学术质量信息的需求日益增加,这有助于当局问责并影响大学排名。在教育机构中,教育的目的是培养有知识的学生并提高大学系统的质量。在众多评估模型中,CIPP模型即背景、投入、过程、产出模型是教育评估中非常有益且值得推荐的方法。这是一项于2014年在德黑兰医科大学(TUMS)四个选定学院(公共卫生、护理与助产学、康复与联合医学科学)的本科教育部门进行的描述性研究。本研究从学生和毕业生的角度找出本科课程的质量水平并确定其薄弱环节。数据通过研究者自制的问卷收集。然后使用描述性和推断性统计对收集到的数据进行分析。结果显示,背景、过程和产出领域情况不佳,投入方面除了“学生对专业和劳动力市场的兴趣与理解”因素情况相对较好外,其他方面情况也不佳。最后,研究者建议采取一些措施来改进项目的目标和使命、分配预算、课程设置以及建立与毕业生沟通的系统。