University of Nebraska, Lincoln , Lincoln Nebraska 68588-0115, United States.
GC Image, LLC , Lincoln Nebraska 68505-7403, United States.
Anal Chem. 2016 Oct 18;88(20):10028-10035. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02254. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
As columns age and differ between systems, retention times for comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GCxGC) may vary between runs. To properly analyze GCxGC chromatograms, it often is desirable to align the retention times of chromatographic features, such as analyte peaks, between chromatograms. Previous work by the authors has shown that global, low-degree polynomial transformation functions, namely affine, second-degree polynomial, and third-degree polynomial, are effective for aligning pairs of two-dimensional chromatograms acquired with dual second columns and detectors (GC×2GC). This work assesses the experimental performance of these global methods on more general GCxGC chromatogram pairs and compares their performance to that of a recent, robust, local alignment algorithm for GCxGC data [ Gros Anal. Chem. 2012 , 84 , 9033 ]. Measuring performance with the root-mean-square (RMS) residual differences in retention times for matched peaks suggests that global, low-degree polynomial transformations outperform the local algorithm given a sufficiently large set of alignment points, and are able to improve misalignment by over 95% based on a lower-bound benchmark of inherent variability. However, with small sets of alignment points, the local method demonstrated lower error rates (although with greater computational overhead). For GCxGC chromatogram pairs with only slight initial misalignment, none of the global or local methods performed well. In some cases with initial misalignment near the inherent variability of the system, these methods worsened alignment, suggesting that it may be better not to perform alignment in such cases.
随着柱子的老化和系统之间的差异,全二维气相色谱(GCxGC)的保留时间在运行之间可能会有所不同。为了正确分析 GCxGC 色谱图,通常希望在色谱图之间对齐色谱特征(如分析物峰)的保留时间。作者之前的工作表明,全局、低阶多项式变换函数(即仿射、二次多项式和三次多项式)对于对齐双二阶柱和检测器(GC×2GC)获得的二维色谱图对是有效的。这项工作评估了这些全局方法在更一般的 GCxGC 色谱图对上的实验性能,并将它们的性能与最近的稳健的局部 GCxGC 数据对齐算法进行了比较[Gros Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 9033]。使用匹配峰的保留时间的均方根(RMS)残差差异来衡量性能表明,对于足够大的对齐点集,全局低阶多项式变换优于局部算法,并且能够将不对齐度提高 95%以上,基于固有可变性的下限基准。然而,对于具有少量对齐点的局部方法,显示出较低的错误率(尽管计算开销更大)。对于初始不对齐程度较小的 GCxGC 色谱图对,全局或局部方法都无法很好地执行。在某些初始不对齐接近系统固有可变性的情况下,这些方法会恶化对齐,这表明在这种情况下可能最好不要执行对齐。