• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双气囊导管与口服米索前列醇序贯用于引产的时机。

Timing of sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol for induction of labor.

作者信息

Kehl Sven, Böhm Lena, Weiss Christel, Heimrich Jutta, Dammer Ulf, Baier Friederike, Sütterlin Marc, Beckmann Matthias W, Faschingbauer Florian

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Germany.

Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, University Medical Center Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Nov;42(11):1495-1501. doi: 10.1111/jog.13089. Epub 2016 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1111/jog.13089
PMID:27642010
Abstract

AIM

The best time to commence cervical ripening with a balloon catheter is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether application of a balloon catheter in the morning or in the evening is better when sequential prostaglandin application is planned.

METHODS

This multicenter historical cohort study included 415 women with an unfavorable cervix undergoing labor induction at term. Labor was induced with a double-balloon catheter and the sequential use of oral misoprostol if necessary. The balloon catheter was placed in the morning group between 02:00-15:00 and in the evening group between 15:00-02:00. The primary outcome measure was the cesarean section rate. Secondary outcome measures included failed labor induction (no vaginal delivery within 72 h).

RESULTS

The cesarean section rate did not differ between the groups (morning 26.9%, evening 24.3%; P = 0.5553); however, more women in the morning group did not deliver within 72 h (8.8% vs 3.1%; P = 0.0138). In nulliparous women, labor induction failed more often in the morning group (12% vs. 4%, P = 0.043). In parous women, the induction-to-delivery interval was longer in the morning group (1756 vs. 1349 min; P = 0.046), and there were fewer deliveries within 24 h (35% vs. 56%, P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

When sequential use of a double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol for labor induction is planned, the preferable time for catheter placement is in the evening. This resulted in fewer failed inductions in nulliparous women and a shorter induction-to-delivery interval and more deliveries within 24 h in parous women.

摘要

目的

使用球囊导管开始宫颈成熟的最佳时间尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估在计划序贯应用前列腺素时,早上或晚上应用球囊导管是否更佳。

方法

这项多中心历史性队列研究纳入了415名足月引产时宫颈条件不佳的女性。采用双球囊导管引产,必要时序贯口服米索前列醇。球囊导管在上午组于02:00至15:00放置,在晚上组于15:00至02:00放置。主要结局指标是剖宫产率。次要结局指标包括引产失败(72小时内未阴道分娩)。

结果

两组的剖宫产率无差异(上午组26.9%,晚上组24.3%;P = 0.5553);然而,上午组更多女性在72小时内未分娩(8.8%对3.1%;P = 0.0138)。在未产妇中,上午组引产失败更常见(12%对4%,P = 0.043)。在经产妇中,上午组引产至分娩间隔更长(1756对1349分钟;P = 0.046),24小时内分娩的较少(35%对56%,P = 0.016)。

结论

当计划序贯使用双球囊导管和口服米索前列醇引产时,放置导管的更佳时间是晚上。这导致未产妇引产失败较少,经产妇引产至分娩间隔更短且24小时内分娩更多。

相似文献

1
Timing of sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol for induction of labor.双气囊导管与口服米索前列醇序贯用于引产的时机。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Nov;42(11):1495-1501. doi: 10.1111/jog.13089. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
2
Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term: a retrospective cohort study.双球囊导管联合序贯口服米索前列醇与单纯口服米索前列醇用于足月引产:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Sep;204:78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
3
Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.序贯使用双球囊导管和口服米索前列醇与单独口服米索前列醇用于足月引产(CRBplus 试验):一项多中心、开放标签随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2015 Jan;122(1):129-36. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13116. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
4
Intravaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction in Nulliparous Women: A Double-blinded, Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.米索前列醇阴道给药用于未产妇宫颈成熟和引产:一项双盲、前瞻性随机对照研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Oct 20;128(20):2736-42. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.167299.
5
Misoprostol in Addition to a Double-Balloon Catheter for Induction: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.米索前列醇联合双球囊导管用于引产:一项双盲随机对照试验
Am J Perinatol. 2018 Feb;35(3):225-232. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606606. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
Foley Catheter or Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Women with Term Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Multicenter Trial.用于足月胎膜早破孕妇引产的 Foley 导管或口服米索前列醇:一项随机多中心试验
Am J Perinatol. 2016 Jul;33(9):866-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1580608. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
7
Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone.宫颈条件不佳的初产妇引产:双球囊导管与地诺前列酮的比较
J Perinat Med. 2014 Mar;42(2):213-8. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0152.
8
Women's acceptance of a double-balloon device as an additional method for inducing labour.女性对双球囊装置作为引产的附加方法的接受程度。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 May;168(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.018. Epub 2013 Jan 6.
9
A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study.米索前列醇阴道栓剂与米索前列醇阴道片剂用于初产妇引产的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 5;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1647-3.
10
Vaginal misoprostol and cervical ripening balloon for induction of labor in late-term pregnancies.阴道用米索前列醇和宫颈扩张球囊用于晚期妊娠引产
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017 Jan;43(1):87-91. doi: 10.1111/jog.13193. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Induction of Labour with a Double Balloon Catheter - Comparison of Effectiveness of Six Versus Twelve Hours Insertion Time: a Prospective Case Control Study.使用双球囊导管引产——6小时与12小时置入时间的有效性比较:一项前瞻性病例对照研究。
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023 Nov 30;83(12):1500-1507. doi: 10.1055/a-2177-0290. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Implementation of Evidence-Based Cervical Ripening Protocol: Outcomes and Next Steps.基于证据的宫颈成熟方案的实施:结果与后续步骤
AJP Rep. 2020 Oct;10(4):e408-e412. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721443. Epub 2020 Dec 3.