Zakama Arthurine, Sobhani Nasim C, Lamar Robyn, Rosenstein Melissa G
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California.
AJP Rep. 2020 Oct;10(4):e408-e412. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721443. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
A prominent randomized controlled trial demonstrated that low-dose misoprostol with the concurrent cervical Foley shortened the median time to delivery when compared with either method alone. Our study aims to address implementation of this protocol and evaluate its impact on time to delivery. This was a retrospective before-and-after study of nulliparous women who delivered nonanomalous, term, singletons at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) in two separate 2-year periods before and after changes in UCSF's cervical ripening protocol. The primary outcome was time from first misoprostol dose to delivery. A total of 1,496 women met inclusion criteria, with 698 in the preimplementation group and 798 in the postimplementation group. There were no statistically significant differences in time to delivery (29 vs. 30 hours, = 0.69), rate of cesarean delivery (30 vs. 26%, = 0.09), or cesarean delivery for fetal indications (11 vs. 8%, = 0.15) between the groups. Implementing evidence-based low-dose misoprostol with the concurrent cervical Foley did not change the time to delivery, time to vaginal-delivery, or likelihood of vaginal delivery in our population. This may be due to differences in labor management practices and incomplete fidelity to the protocol. Real-world effectiveness of these interventions will vary and should be considered when choosing an induction method.
一项著名的随机对照试验表明,与单独使用任何一种方法相比,低剂量米索前列醇联合宫颈 Foley 导尿管可缩短分娩中位时间。我们的研究旨在探讨该方案的实施情况,并评估其对分娩时间的影响。 这是一项对在加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校(UCSF)分娩的未生育女性进行的回顾性前后对照研究,研究对象为在 UCSF 宫颈成熟方案改变前后两个独立的 2 年期间分娩的非异常足月单胎。主要结局是从首次使用米索前列醇剂量到分娩的时间。 共有 1496 名女性符合纳入标准,实施前组有 698 名,实施后组有 798 名。两组之间在分娩时间(29 小时对 30 小时,P = 0.69)、剖宫产率(30%对 26%,P = 0.09)或因胎儿指征行剖宫产率(11%对 8%,P = 0.15)方面无统计学显著差异。 在我们的人群中,实施基于证据的低剂量米索前列醇联合宫颈 Foley 导尿管并未改变分娩时间、阴道分娩时间或阴道分娩的可能性。这可能是由于分娩管理实践的差异以及对方案的不完全依从。这些干预措施在现实世界中的有效性会有所不同,在选择引产方法时应予以考虑。