Occhipinti Mariaelena, Heidinger Benedikt H, Pfannenberg Christina, Munden Reginald F, Eisenberg Ronald L, Bankier Alexander A
*Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA †Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy ‡Department of Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany §Department of Radiology, Houston Methodist Hospital and Research Institute, Houston, TX.
J Thorac Imaging. 2017 Mar;32(2):115-120. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000231.
The aim of this study was to analyze the impact that a clinical history of an oncologic disease may have on the management decisions for incidentally detected lung nodules on chest computed tomographic (CT) examinations.
An electronic survey was sent to all 796 members of the Society of Thoracic Radiology regarding criteria for the management of incidentally detected lung nodules in oncologic patients, as well as recommendations for nodule follow-up. Nodule characteristics and clinical parameters used by respondents were analyzed. Differences between variables were examined using the χ test.
Of the 796 Society of Thoracic Radiology members, 178 (22.36%) replied. Most respondents were subspecialized in cardiothoracic imaging (92.70%) and practiced in an "academic or teaching hospital setting" (75.28%) with a "dedicated oncology center" (94.03%). "History of oncologic disease" was the most important factor (98.87%) for management decisions. In patients with such a history, respondents most commonly used "experience and common sense" (56.74%) and reported "all incidentally found lung nodules" (65.73%, P<0.0001). "Size" and "shape" were the 2 most important nodule characteristics (33.61% and 27.05%, respectively) used to consider a nodule "clinically relevant," and "size" (44.07%) was also the most important nodule characteristic prompting recommendation for short-term CT follow-up. Follow-up CT examinations in oncologic patients were recommended by 75.84% of respondents.
In patients with a history of oncologic disease, radiologists tend to report every detected nodule and to routinely recommend follow-up CT examinations. Although most radiologists rely on "experience and common sense" in managing these nodules, greater standardization of lung nodule management in oncologic patients is needed, ideally through guidelines tailored to this patient population.
本研究旨在分析肿瘤疾病临床病史对胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)检查时偶然发现的肺结节管理决策可能产生的影响。
向胸放射学会的所有796名成员发送了一份电子调查问卷,内容涉及肿瘤患者偶然发现的肺结节的管理标准以及结节随访建议。分析了受访者使用的结节特征和临床参数。使用χ检验检查变量之间的差异。
胸放射学会的796名成员中,178名(22.36%)回复。大多数受访者专门从事心胸成像(92.70%),并在设有“专门肿瘤中心”(94.03%)的“学术或教学医院环境”(75.28%)中执业。“肿瘤疾病史”是管理决策中最重要的因素(98.87%)。在有此类病史的患者中,受访者最常使用“经验和常识”(56.74%),并报告“所有偶然发现的肺结节”(65.73%,P<0.0001)。“大小”和“形状”是用于判断结节“具有临床相关性”的两个最重要的结节特征(分别为33.61%和27.05%),“大小”(44.07%)也是促使建议进行短期CT随访的最重要的结节特征。75.84%的受访者建议对肿瘤患者进行随访CT检查。
在有肿瘤疾病史的患者中,放射科医生倾向于报告每一个检测到的结节,并常规建议进行随访CT检查。尽管大多数放射科医生在管理这些结节时依赖“经验和常识”,但肿瘤患者肺结节管理需要更大程度的标准化,理想情况下应通过针对该患者群体的指南来实现。