McDonald Jennifer S, Koo Chi Wan, White Darin, Hartman Thomas E, Bender Claire E, Sykes Anne-Marie G
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
Acad Radiol. 2017 Mar;24(3):337-344. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.08.026. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
The study aimed to determine whether the addition of the Fleischner Society guidelines to chest computed tomography (CT) reports identifying incidental pulmonary nodules affects follow-up care.
Beginning in 2008, a template containing the Fleischner Society guidelines was added at the interpreting radiologist's discretion to chest CT reports describing incidental solid pulmonary nodules at our institution. The records of all medical centers in Olmsted county were used to capture the complete medical history of local patients >35 years old diagnosed with a pulmonary nodule from April 1, 2008 to October 1, 2011. Patients with a history of cancer or previously diagnosed nodule, or who died before follow-up, were excluded. Patients were categorized according to whether they did ("template group") or did not ("control group") have the template added. Nodule size and smoking history were used to determine recommended follow-up care. Differences in follow-up were compared between groups using Pearson's chi-square test.
A total of 510 patients (276 in the template group, 234 in the control group) were included in the study. Only 198 patients (39%) received their recommended follow-up care. Template group patients were significantly more likely to receive recommended follow-up care compared to control group patients (45% vs 31%, P = .0014). Most patients whose management did not adhere to Fleischner Society guidelines did not receive a recommended follow-up chest CT (210 out of 312, 67%).
The addition of the Fleischner Society guidelines to chest CT reports significantly increases the likelihood of receiving recommended follow-up care for patients with incidental pulmonary nodules. Additional education is needed to improve appropriate guideline utilization by radiologists and adherence by ordering providers.
本研究旨在确定在胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)报告中添加弗莱施纳学会指南,以识别偶然发现的肺结节,是否会影响后续治疗。
从2008年开始,由解读影像的放射科医生自行决定,在我院描述偶然发现的实性肺结节的胸部CT报告中添加包含弗莱施纳学会指南的模板。利用奥尔姆斯特德县所有医疗中心的记录,获取2008年4月1日至2011年10月1日期间当地年龄大于35岁、被诊断为肺结节的患者的完整病史。有癌症病史、先前已诊断的结节或在随访前死亡的患者被排除。根据是否添加模板将患者分为两组(“模板组”和“对照组”)。根据结节大小和吸烟史确定推荐的后续治疗方案。使用Pearson卡方检验比较两组之间后续治疗的差异。
本研究共纳入510例患者(模板组276例,对照组234例)。只有198例患者(39%)接受了推荐的后续治疗。与对照组患者相比,模板组患者接受推荐后续治疗的可能性显著更高(45%对31%,P = 0.0014)。大多数治疗未遵循弗莱施纳学会指南的患者未接受推荐的随访胸部CT检查(312例中有210例,67%)。
在胸部CT报告中添加弗莱施纳学会指南显著增加了偶然发现肺结节患者接受推荐后续治疗的可能性。需要进一步开展教育,以提高放射科医生对指南的合理应用以及医嘱开具者的遵循程度。