Gambardella Claudio, Tartaglia Ernesto, Nunziata Anna, Izzo Graziella, Siciliano Giuseppe, Cavallo Fabio, Mauriello Claudio, Napolitano Salvatore, Thomas Guglielmo, Testa Domenico, Rossetti Gianluca, Sanguinetti Alessandro, Avenia Nicola, Conzo Giovanni
Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Sciences, Second University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Endocrine Surgical Unit, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep 19;14(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1003-5.
Lymph nodal involvement is very common in differentiated thyroid cancer, and in addition, cervical lymph node micrometastases are observed in up to 80 % of papillary thyroid cancers. During the last decades, the role of routine central lymph node dissection (RCLD) in the treatment of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) has been an object of research, and it is now still controversial. Nevertheless, many scientific societies and referral authors have definitely stated that even if in expert hands, RCLD is not associated to higher morbidity; it should be indicated only in selected cases.
In order to better analyze the current role of prophylactic neck dissection in the surgical treatment of papillary thyroid cancers, an analysis of the most recent literature data was performed. Prophylactic or therapeutic lymph node dissection, selective, lateral or central lymph node dissection, modified radical neck dissection, and papillary thyroid cancer were used by the authors as keywords performing a PubMed database research. Literature reviews, PTCs large clinical series and the most recent guidelines of different referral endocrine societies, inhering neck dissection for papillary thyroid cancers, were also specifically evaluated. A higher PTC incidence was nowadays reported in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) clinical series. In addition, ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration citology allowed a more precocious diagnosis in the early phases of disease. The role of prophylactic neck dissection in papillary thyroid cancer management remains controversial especially regarding indications, approach, and surgical extension. Even if morbidity rates seem to be similar to those reported after total thyroidectomy alone, RCLD impact on local recurrence and long-term survival is still a matter of research. Nevertheless, only a selective use in high-risk cases is supported by more and more scientific data.
In the last years, higher papillary thyroid cancer incidence and more precocious diagnoses were worldwide reported. Among endocrine and neck surgeons, there is agreement about indications to prophylactic treatment of node-negative "high-risk" patients. A recent trend toward RCLD avoiding radioactive treatment is still debated, but nevertheless, prophylactic dissections in low-risk cases should be avoided. Prospective randomized trials are needed to evaluate the benefits of different approaches and allow to drawn definitive conclusions.
淋巴结受累在分化型甲状腺癌中非常常见,此外,在高达80%的乳头状甲状腺癌中可观察到颈部淋巴结微转移。在过去几十年中,常规中央淋巴结清扫术(RCLD)在乳头状甲状腺癌(PTC)治疗中的作用一直是研究对象,目前仍存在争议。然而,许多科学协会和权威作者明确指出,即使在专家手中,RCLD也不会导致更高的发病率;仅在特定病例中才应进行。
为了更好地分析预防性颈部清扫术在乳头状甲状腺癌手术治疗中的当前作用,对最新文献数据进行了分析。作者使用预防性或治疗性淋巴结清扫术、选择性、侧方或中央淋巴结清扫术、改良根治性颈部清扫术和乳头状甲状腺癌作为关键词在PubMed数据库进行检索。还特别评估了文献综述、PTC的大型临床系列以及不同权威内分泌学会关于乳头状甲状腺癌颈部清扫术的最新指南。如今在分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)临床系列中报告了更高的PTC发病率。此外,超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学检查可在疾病早期实现更早期的诊断。预防性颈部清扫术在乳头状甲状腺癌治疗中的作用仍存在争议,特别是在适应证、手术方式和手术范围方面。即使发病率似乎与单纯甲状腺全切除术后报告的发病率相似,但RCLD对局部复发和长期生存的影响仍是研究课题。然而,越来越多的科学数据支持仅在高危病例中选择性使用。
近年来,全球范围内报告了更高的乳头状甲状腺癌发病率和更早期的诊断。在内分泌外科医生和颈部外科医生中,对于淋巴结阴性“高危”患者的预防性治疗适应证存在共识。最近避免放射性治疗的RCLD趋势仍存在争议,但无论如何,应避免在低风险病例中进行预防性清扫术。需要进行前瞻性随机试验来评估不同手术方式的益处并得出明确结论。