Barman Tarani Kanta, Kumar Manoj, Mathur Tarun, Chaira Tridib, Ramkumar G, Kalia Vandana, Rao Madhvi, Pandya Manisha, Yadav Ajay Singh, Das Biswajit, Upadhyay Dilip J, Konwar Rituraj, Raj V Samuel, Singh Harpal
Department of Microbiology, Daiichi Sankyo India Pharma Private Limited, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Nov 21;60(12):7134-7145. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00453-16. Print 2016 Dec.
RBx 11760, a bi-aryl oxazolidinone, was investigated for antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria. The MICs of RBx 11760 and linezolid against Staphylococcus aureus were 2 and 4 mg/liter, against Staphylococcus epidermidis were 0.5 and 2 mg/liter, and against Enterococcus were 1 and 4 mg/liter, respectively. Similarly, against Streptococcus pneumoniae the MICs of RBx 11760 and linezolid were 0.5 and 2 mg/liter, respectively. In time-kill studies, RBx 11760, tedizolid, and linezolid exhibited bacteriostatic effect against all tested strains except S. pneumoniae RBx 11760 showed 2-log kill at 4× MIC while tedizolid and linezolid showed 2-log and 1.4-log kill at 16× MIC, respectively, against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) H-29. Against S. pneumoniae 5051, RBx 11760 showed bactericidal activity, with 4.6-log kill at 4× MIC compared to 2.42-log and 1.95-log kill for tedizolid and linezolid, respectively, at 16× MIC. RBx 11760 showed postantibiotic effects (PAE) at 3 h at 4 mg/liter against MRSA H-29, and linezolid showed the same effect at 16 mg/liter. RBx 11760 inhibited biofilm production against methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE) ATCC 35984 in a concentration-dependent manner. In a foreign-body model, linezolid and rifampin resulted in no advantage over stasis, while the same dose of RBx 11760 demonstrated a significant killing compared to the initial control against S. aureus (P < 0.05) and MRSE (P < 0.01). The difference in killing was statistically significant for the lower dose of RBx 11760 (P < 0.05) versus the higher dose of linezolid (P > 0.05 [not significant]) in a groin abscess model. In neutropenic mouse thigh infection, RBx 11760 showed stasis at 20 mg/kg of body weight, whereas tedizolid showed the same effect at 40 mg/kg. These data support RBx 11760 as a promising investigational candidate.
双芳基恶唑烷酮RBx 11760针对革兰氏阳性菌的抗菌活性进行了研究。RBx 11760和利奈唑胺对金黄色葡萄球菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)分别为2毫克/升和4毫克/升,对表皮葡萄球菌的MIC分别为0.5毫克/升和2毫克/升,对肠球菌的MIC分别为1毫克/升和4毫克/升。同样,RBx 11760和利奈唑胺对肺炎链球菌的MIC分别为0.5毫克/升和2毫克/升。在时间-杀菌研究中,RBx 11760、替地唑胺和利奈唑胺对除肺炎链球菌外的所有测试菌株均表现出抑菌作用。针对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)H-29,RBx 11760在4倍MIC时显示2个对数级的杀灭效果,而替地唑胺和利奈唑胺在16倍MIC时分别显示2个对数级和1.4个对数级的杀灭效果。针对肺炎链球菌5051,RBx 11760表现出杀菌活性,在4倍MIC时达到4.6个对数级的杀灭效果,而替地唑胺和利奈唑胺在16倍MIC时分别为2.42个对数级和1.95个对数级的杀灭效果。RBx 11760在4毫克/升时对MRSA H-29在3小时时显示出抗生素后效应(PAE),利奈唑胺在16毫克/升时显示出相同效果。RBx 11760以浓度依赖的方式抑制耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌(MRSE)ATCC 35984生物膜的形成。在异物模型中,利奈唑胺和利福平与不进行治疗相比并无优势,而相同剂量的RBx 11760与初始对照相比,对金黄色葡萄球菌(P < 0.05)和MRSE(P < 0.01)显示出显著的杀菌效果。在腹股沟脓肿模型中,较低剂量的RBx 11760(P < 0.05)与较高剂量的利奈唑胺(P > 0.05[无显著性差异])相比,杀菌差异具有统计学意义。在中性粒细胞减少小鼠大腿感染模型中,RBx 11760在体重20毫克/千克时显示出抑菌效果,而替地唑胺在40毫克/千克时显示出相同效果。这些数据支持RBx 11760是一个有前景的研究候选药物。