• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Activating Patients With a Tailored Bone Density Test Results Letter and Educational Brochure: the PAADRN Randomized Controlled Trial.通过个性化的骨密度检测结果信和教育手册激活患者:PAADRN随机对照试验
J Clin Densitom. 2017 Oct-Dec;20(4):464-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
2
The effects of a patient activation intervention on smoking and excessive drinking cessations: results from the PAADRN randomized controlled trial.患者激活干预对戒烟和戒酒的影响:来自 PAADRN 随机对照试验的结果。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):3055-3060. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4101-5. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
3
Patient-activation and guideline-concordant pharmacological treatment after bone density testing: the PAADRN randomized controlled trial.骨密度检测后的患者激活与指南一致的药物治疗:PAADRN随机对照试验
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Dec;27(12):3513-3524. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3681-9. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
4
Effects of a DXA result letter on satisfaction, quality of life, and osteoporosis knowledge: a randomized controlled trial.双能X线吸收法(DXA)检测结果告知信对满意度、生活质量和骨质疏松症知识的影响:一项随机对照试验
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Aug 26;17(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1227-0.
5
The cost of a patient activation intervention for achieving successful outcomes: results from the PAADRN randomized controlled trial.患者激活干预以实现成功结局的成本:来自 PAADRN 随机对照试验的结果。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):3061-3066. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4113-1. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
6
Diet and exercise changes following bone densitometry in the Patient Activation After DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) study.在骨密度仪检测结果通知后(PAADRN)研究中,患者激活后的饮食和运动变化。
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Jan 6;13(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0402-8.
7
Evaluation of a "Just-in-Time" Nurse Consultation on Bone Health: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.关于骨骼健康的“即时”护士咨询评估:一项试点随机对照试验。
Perm J. 2017;21:16-112. doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-112.
8
A randomized study of two different information-based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures.一项关于两种不同基于信息的干预措施对轻度和中度创伤性骨折骨质疏松症管理效果的随机研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(9):1309-17. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0078-1. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
9
The prevalence of overtreatment of osteoporosis: results from the PAADRN trial.骨质疏松过度治疗的流行:PAADRN 试验的结果。
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Sep 28;13(1):103. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0517-6.
10
The PAADRN study: a design for a randomized controlled practical clinical trial to improve bone health.PAADRN 研究:一项旨在改善骨骼健康的随机对照实际临床试验的设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Jan;34(1):90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Effective communication regarding risk of fracture for individuals at risk of fragility fracture: a scoping review.针对脆性骨折风险人群骨折风险的有效沟通:范围综述。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Jan;33(1):13-26. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-06151-7. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
2
Sex differences in osteoporosis self-efficacy among community-residing older adults presenting for DXA.社区居住的老年骨质疏松症患者 DXA 检查时的骨质疏松症自我效能的性别差异。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 May;30(5):1033-1041. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04854-6. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
3
Evaluation of a Multimodal, Direct-to-Patient Educational Intervention Targeting Barriers to Osteoporosis Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.评价一种针对骨质疏松症护理障碍的多模式、直接面向患者的教育干预措施:一项随机临床试验。
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 May;33(5):763-772. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3395. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
4
Patient-reported reasons for nonadherence to recommended osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.患者自述的不坚持推荐的骨质疏松症药物治疗的原因。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Jul-Aug;57(4):503-509. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
5
Racial Differences and Disparities in Osteoporosis-related Bone Health: Results From the PAADRN Randomized Controlled Trial.骨质疏松症相关骨骼健康的种族差异与差距:PAADRN随机对照试验的结果
Med Care. 2017 Jun;55(6):561-568. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000718.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding Preferences for Osteoporosis Information to Develop an Osteoporosis Patient Education Brochure.了解骨质疏松症信息偏好以制定骨质疏松症患者教育手册。
Perm J. 2017;21:16-024. doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-024. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
2
Patient-activation and guideline-concordant pharmacological treatment after bone density testing: the PAADRN randomized controlled trial.骨密度检测后的患者激活与指南一致的药物治疗:PAADRN随机对照试验
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Dec;27(12):3513-3524. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3681-9. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
3
Disparities in osteoporosis treatments.骨质疏松症治疗方面的差异。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Feb;27(2):509-19. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3249-0. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
4
Underuse and Overuse of Osteoporosis Screening in a Regional Health System: a Retrospective Cohort Study.区域卫生系统中骨质疏松症筛查的使用不足与过度使用:一项回顾性队列研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Dec;30(12):1733-40. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3349-8. Epub 2015 May 19.
5
Improving bone mineral density reporting to patients with an illustration of personal fracture risk.通过展示个人骨折风险来改善向患者报告骨矿物质密度的情况。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Nov 25;14:101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0101-y.
6
Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis.骨质疏松症防治临床指南
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Oct;25(10):2359-81. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
7
Developing a bone mineral density test result letter to send to patients: a mixed-methods study.撰写一份致患者的骨密度检测结果信函:一项混合方法研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Jun 5;8:827-41. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S60106. eCollection 2014.
8
The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine.基于股骨颈或腰椎骨密度的美国近期骨质疏松症和低骨量患病率
J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Nov;29(11):2520-6. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2269.
9
Osteoporosis medication use after hip fracture in U.S. patients between 2002 and 2011.2002年至2011年间美国髋部骨折患者使用骨质疏松症药物的情况。
J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Sep;29(9):1929-37. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2202.
10
What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs.关于患者激活的证据表明:更好的健康结果和护理体验;关于成本的数据较少。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):207-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061.

通过个性化的骨密度检测结果信和教育手册激活患者:PAADRN随机对照试验

Activating Patients With a Tailored Bone Density Test Results Letter and Educational Brochure: the PAADRN Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Wolinsky Fredric D, Lou Yiyue, Edmonds Stephanie W, Hall Sylvie F, Jones Michael P, Wright Nicole C, Saag Kenneth G, Cram Peter, Roblin Douglas W

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Densitom. 2017 Oct-Dec;20(4):464-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocd.2016.08.012
PMID:27647261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5354993/
Abstract

In cross-sectional studies, patient activation has been associated with better health behaviors, health outcomes, and health-care experiences. Moreover, tailored interventions have led to clinically meaningful improvements in patient activation, as well as health outcomes over time. We tested whether a tailored patient-activation letter communicating bone mineral density (BMD) test results plus an educational brochure improved patient activation scores and levels at 12 and 52 wk post-baseline as the mechanism leading to enhanced bone healthcare. In a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, multicenter pragmatic clinical trial, we randomized 7749 patients ≥50 yr old and presenting for BMD testing at 3 medical centers in the United States between February 2012 and August 2014. The outcome measures were patient activation scores and levels based on 6 items taken from the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) that were administered at the baseline, 12-wk, and 52-wk follow-up interviews. Mean age was 66.6 yr, 83.8% were women, and 75.3% were Non-Hispanic-Whites. Overall, PAM activation scores improved from 58.1 at baseline to 76.4 by 12 wk (p < 0.001) and to 77.2 (p = 0.002) by 52 wk post-baseline. These improvements, however, were not significantly different between the intervention and usual care groups (18.7 vs 18.1, p = 0.176, at 12 wk) in intention-to-treat analyses. PAM activation scores and levels substantially improved at 12 wk and 52 wk, but no differences were observed in these improvements between the intervention and usual care groups. These null findings may have occurred because the tailoring focused on the patient's BMD and fracture risk results, rather than on the patient's BMD and fracture risk results as well as the patient's baseline PAM activation scores or levels.

摘要

在横断面研究中,患者的激活状态与更好的健康行为、健康结果及医疗保健体验相关。此外,量身定制的干预措施已使患者的激活状态以及长期的健康结果在临床上得到了有意义的改善。我们测试了一封传达骨密度(BMD)检测结果的量身定制的患者激活信以及一本教育手册,是否能在基线后12周和52周提高患者的激活分数和水平,以此作为改善骨骼医疗保健的机制。在一项随机、对照、双盲、多中心实用型临床试验中,我们将2012年2月至2014年8月期间在美国3个医疗中心进行BMD检测的7749名50岁及以上患者随机分组。结局指标是基于从患者激活量表(PAM)中选取的6个项目得出的患者激活分数和水平,这些项目在基线、12周和52周随访访谈时进行测量。平均年龄为66.6岁,83.8%为女性,75.3%为非西班牙裔白人。总体而言,PAM激活分数从基线时的58.1提高到12周时的76.4(p<0.001),基线后52周时提高到77.2(p = 0.002)。然而,在意向性分析中,干预组和常规护理组之间在这些改善方面没有显著差异(12周时为18.7对18.1,p = 0.176)。PAM激活分数和水平在12周和52周时大幅提高,但干预组和常规护理组在这些改善方面未观察到差异。这些无效结果可能是因为量身定制侧重于患者的BMD和骨折风险结果,而不是患者的BMD和骨折风险结果以及患者的基线PAM激活分数或水平。