Ronk Argo, de Bello Francesco, Fibich Pavel, Pärtel Meelis
Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences University of Tartu Lai 40 Tartu 51005 Estonia.
Department of Botany Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia Branišovská 31 370 05 České Budějovice Czech Republic.
Ecol Evol. 2016 Aug 4;6(17):6266-81. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2371. eCollection 2016 Sep.
Large-scale biodiversity studies can be more informative if observed diversity in a study site is accompanied by dark diversity, the set of absent although ecologically suitable species. Dark diversity methodology is still being developed and a comparison of different approaches is needed. We used plant data at two different scales (European and seven large regions) and compared dark diversity estimates from two mathematical methods: species co-occurrence (SCO) and species distribution modeling (SDM). We used plant distribution data from the Atlas Florae Europaeae (50 × 50 km grid cells) and seven different European regions (10 × 10 km grid cells). Dark diversity was estimated by SCO and SDM for both datasets. We examined the relationship between the dark diversity sizes (type II regression) and the overlap in species composition (overlap coefficient). We tested the overlap probability according to the hypergeometric distribution. We combined the estimates of the two methods to determine consensus dark diversity and composite dark diversity. We tested whether dark diversity and completeness of site diversity (log ratio of observed and dark diversity) are related to various natural and anthropogenic factors differently than simple observed diversity. Both methods provided similar dark diversity sizes and distribution patterns; dark diversity is greater in southern Europe. The regression line, however, deviated from a 1:1 relationship. The species composition overlap of two methods was about 75%, which is much greater than expected by chance. Both consensus and composite dark diversity estimates showed similar distribution patterns. Both dark diversity and completeness measures exhibit relationships to natural and anthropogenic factors different than those exhibited by observed richness. In summary, dark diversity revealed new biodiversity patterns which were not evident when only observed diversity was examined. A new perspective in dark diversity studies can incorporate a combination of methods.
如果在一个研究地点观察到的多样性伴随着暗多样性(即虽生态适宜但未出现的物种集合),那么大规模生物多样性研究可能会提供更多信息。暗多样性方法仍在发展中,需要对不同方法进行比较。我们使用了两个不同尺度(欧洲和七个大区域)的植物数据,并比较了两种数学方法估计的暗多样性:物种共现法(SCO)和物种分布建模法(SDM)。我们使用了来自《欧洲植物志图谱》(50×50千米网格单元)和七个不同欧洲区域(10×10千米网格单元)的植物分布数据。对这两个数据集都用SCO和SDM估计了暗多样性。我们研究了暗多样性大小之间的关系(II型回归)以及物种组成的重叠情况(重叠系数)。我们根据超几何分布检验了重叠概率。我们结合两种方法的估计值来确定共识暗多样性和复合暗多样性。我们检验了暗多样性和地点多样性的完整性(观察到的多样性与暗多样性的对数比)与各种自然和人为因素的关系是否与简单的观察到的多样性不同。两种方法提供了相似的暗多样性大小和分布模式;南欧的暗多样性更大。然而,回归线偏离了1:1的关系。两种方法的物种组成重叠约为75%,这远高于偶然预期。共识暗多样性估计值和复合暗多样性估计值都显示出相似的分布模式。暗多样性和完整性度量与自然和人为因素的关系都与观察到的丰富度所表现出的关系不同。总之,暗多样性揭示了仅考察观察到的多样性时不明显的新生物多样性模式。暗多样性研究的一个新视角可以纳入多种方法的组合。