Grzankowski Kassondra S, Szender J Brian, Spring-Robinson Chandra L, Lele Shashikant B, Odunsi Kunle O, Frederick Peter J
*Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute; †Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York at Buffalo; and ‡Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 Oct;26(8):1440-7. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000785.
The time interval between diagnoses of breast cancer (BC) and endometrial cancer (EC) is not well established in women with metachronous primary tumors. We sought to examine this interval and identify associations with treatment-related and clinicopathologic factors.
We identified 141 patients who developed both cancers during 1966 to 2013. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1, BC first, and group 2, EC first. Subanalysis performed of group 1 (59 patients) stratified around adjuvant tamoxifen use: pre-1990 BC diagnosis and post.
Fifty-nine and 82 patients were in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean time interval was comparable (76 vs 74 months, P = 0.861). Subanalysis divided group 1 into pre- (n = 27) and post- (n = 32) 1990 and resulted in different mean time intervals between diagnosis of metachronous cancers (106 vs 50 months, respectively [P = 0.042]). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for EC were longer in the pre group (PFS, 51 vs 26 months [P = 0.169]; OS, 59 vs 27 months [P = 0.190]). Median PFS and OS for BC were also longer in this group (PFS, 147 vs 109 months [P = 0.005]; OS, 166 vs 114 months [P < 0.001]).
Our data indicate the mean time interval between the diagnosis of EC and BC was approximately 6 years. Disease-specific EC survival was worse for patients with a previous diagnosis of BC. Stratification around implementation of tamoxifen use shows comparable grade and stage but different time interval and survival, suggesting resulting effects from adjuvant therapy for BC. These results are useful in counseling women at risk.
在患有异时性原发性肿瘤的女性中,乳腺癌(BC)和子宫内膜癌(EC)诊断之间的时间间隔尚未明确确立。我们试图研究这一间隔,并确定其与治疗相关因素及临床病理因素之间的关联。
我们确定了1966年至2013年期间患这两种癌症的141例患者。患者分为两组:第1组,先诊断为BC;第2组,先诊断为EC。对第1组(59例患者)围绕辅助性他莫昔芬的使用进行亚组分析:1990年前BC诊断组和之后的组。
第1组和第2组分别有59例和82例患者。平均时间间隔相当(76个月对74个月,P = 0.861)。亚组分析将第1组分为1990年前(n = 27)和之后(n = 32)两组,异时性癌症诊断之间的平均时间间隔不同(分别为106个月对50个月[P = 0.042])。EC的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)中位数在1990年前组更长(PFS,51个月对26个月[P = 0.169];OS,59个月对27个月[P = 0.190])。该组中BC的PFS和OS中位数也更长(PFS,147个月对109个月[P = 0.005];OS,166个月对114个月[P < 0.001])。
我们的数据表明,EC和BC诊断之间的平均时间间隔约为6年。先前诊断为BC的患者,EC的疾病特异性生存期较差。围绕他莫昔芬使用实施情况进行分层显示,分级和分期相当,但时间间隔和生存期不同,提示BC辅助治疗产生的影响。这些结果有助于为有风险的女性提供咨询。