Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Sep 7;103(17):1299-309. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr242. Epub 2011 Jul 9.
Aromatase inhibitors are associated with consistent improvements in disease-free survival but not in overall survival. We conducted a literature-based meta-analysis of randomized trials to examine whether the relative toxicity of aromatase inhibitors compared with tamoxifen may explain this finding.
We conducted a systematic review to identify randomized controlled trials that compared aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen as primary adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and databases of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), absolute risks, and the number needed to harm associated with one adverse event were computed for prespecified serious adverse events including cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, bone fractures, thromboembolic events, endometrial carcinoma and other second cancers not including new breast cancer. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Seven trials enrolling 30,023 patients met the inclusion criteria. Longer duration of aromatase inhibitor use was associated with increased odds of developing cardiovascular disease (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.43, P < .001; number needed to harm = 132) and bone fractures (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.34 to 1.61, P < .001; number needed to harm = 46), but a decreased odds of venous thrombosis (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.64, P < .001; number needed to harm = 79) and endometrial carcinoma (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.53, P < .001; number needed to harm = 258). Five years of aromatase inhibitors was associated with a non-statistically significant increased odds of death without recurrence compared with 5 years of tamoxifen alone or tamoxifen for 2-3 years followed by an aromatase inhibitor for 2-3 years (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.26, P = .09).
The cumulative toxicity of aromatase inhibitors when used as up-front treatment may explain the lack of overall survival benefit despite improvements in disease-free survival. Switching from tamoxifen to aromatase inhibitors reduces this toxicity and is likely the best balance between efficacy and toxicity.
芳香化酶抑制剂与疾病无进展生存率的持续改善相关,但与总生存率无关。我们进行了一项基于文献的荟萃分析,以检查与他莫昔芬相比,芳香化酶抑制剂的相对毒性是否可以解释这一发现。
我们通过搜索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和美国临床肿瘤学会和圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会数据库,对比较绝经后妇女中芳香化酶抑制剂和他莫昔芬作为一线辅助内分泌治疗的随机对照试验进行了系统综述。计算了预先指定的严重不良事件的比值比(OR)、95%置信区间(CI)、绝对风险和与一种不良事件相关的需要治疗人数,这些不良事件包括心血管疾病、脑血管疾病、骨折、血栓栓塞事件、子宫内膜癌和不包括新乳腺癌的其他第二癌症。所有统计检验均为双侧。
有 7 项试验共纳入 30023 名患者符合纳入标准。芳香化酶抑制剂使用时间较长与心血管疾病(OR = 1.26,95%CI = 1.10-1.43,P <.001;需要治疗人数 = 132)和骨折(OR = 1.47,95%CI = 1.34-1.61,P <.001;需要治疗人数 = 46)的发生几率增加相关,但与静脉血栓形成(OR = 0.55,95%CI = 0.46-0.64,P <.001;需要治疗人数 = 79)和子宫内膜癌(OR = 0.34,95%CI = 0.22-0.53,P <.001;需要治疗人数 = 258)的发生几率降低相关。与单独使用 5 年他莫昔芬或使用 2-3 年他莫昔芬后再使用 2-3 年芳香化酶抑制剂相比,5 年芳香化酶抑制剂治疗与无复发生存率但无统计学意义的死亡率增加相关(OR = 1.11,95%CI = 0.98-1.26,P = 0.09)。
芳香化酶抑制剂作为一线治疗时的累积毒性可能解释了无进展生存率改善但总生存率无获益的原因。从他莫昔芬转为芳香化酶抑制剂可降低这种毒性,可能是在疗效和毒性之间的最佳平衡。