• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调动认知以实现快速行动:“更加努力尝试”的指令在恒定前间隔范式中促进动机性准备状态。

Mobilizing cognition for speeded action: try-harder instructions promote motivated readiness in the constant-foreperiod paradigm.

作者信息

Steinborn Michael B, Langner Robert, Huestegge Lynn

机构信息

Psychologie III, University of Wuerzburg, Röntgenring 11, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.

Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2017 Nov;81(6):1135-1151. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0810-1. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-016-0810-1
PMID:27650820
Abstract

We examined the effect of motivational readiness on cognitive performance. An important but still not sufficiently elaborated question is whether individuals can voluntarily increase cognitive efficiency for an impending target event, given sufficient preparation time. Within the framework of the constant-foreperiod design (comparing reaction time performance in blocks of short and long foreperiod intervals, FPs), we examined the effect of an instruction to try harder (instructional cue: standard vs. effort) in a choice-reaction task on performance speed and variability. Proceeding from previous theoretical considerations, we expected the instruction to speed-up processing irrespective of FP length, while error rate should be increased in the short-FP but decreased in the long-FP condition. Overall, the results confirmed this prediction. Importantly, the distributional (ex-Gaussian and delta plot) analysis revealed that the instruction to try harder decreased distributional skewness (i.e., longer percentiles were more affected), indicating that mobilization ensured temporal performance stability (persistence).

摘要

我们研究了动机准备状态对认知表现的影响。一个重要但仍未得到充分阐述的问题是,在有足够准备时间的情况下,个体是否能够为即将到来的目标事件自愿提高认知效率。在恒定前间隔设计的框架内(比较短前间隔和长前间隔组块中的反应时表现,即前间隔,FPs),我们在一个选择反应任务中考察了“更加努力尝试”的指令(指令线索:标准与努力)对表现速度和变异性的影响。基于先前的理论思考,我们预期该指令会加快处理速度,而与前间隔长度无关,同时错误率在短前间隔条件下应会增加,而在长前间隔条件下应会降低。总体而言,结果证实了这一预测。重要的是,分布分析(前高斯分布和增量图)显示,“更加努力尝试”的指令降低了分布偏度(即较长百分位数受影响更大),表明动员确保了时间上的表现稳定性(持续性)。

相似文献

1
Mobilizing cognition for speeded action: try-harder instructions promote motivated readiness in the constant-foreperiod paradigm.调动认知以实现快速行动:“更加努力尝试”的指令在恒定前间隔范式中促进动机性准备状态。
Psychol Res. 2017 Nov;81(6):1135-1151. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0810-1. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
2
Arousal modulates temporal preparation under increased time uncertainty: Evidence from higher-order sequential foreperiod effects.在时间不确定性增加的情况下,唤醒调节时间准备:来自高阶序列前周期效应的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Jan;139(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
3
Dynamic adjustment of temporal preparation: shifting warning signal modality attenuates the sequential foreperiod effect.时间准备的动态调整:改变警告信号模态可减弱序列前周期效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Sep;132(1):40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jul 2.
4
Functional dissociations in temporal preparation: evidence from dual-task performance.时间准备中的功能分离:来自双重任务表现的证据。
Cognition. 2014 Feb;130(2):141-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
5
When specific action biases meet nonspecific preparation: Event repetition modulates the variable-foreperiod effect.当特定动作偏差遇到非特定准备时:事件重复调节可变前周期效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Sep;44(9):1313-1323. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000561. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
6
Temporal preparation in aging: a functional MRI study.衰老过程中的时间准备:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Nov;47(13):2876-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.013. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
7
The Puzzling Relationship between Attention and Motivation: Do Motor Biases Matter?注意与动机之间的复杂关系:运动偏差是否重要?
Neuroscience. 2019 May 15;406:150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
8
Reward motivation normalises temporal attention after sleep deprivation.奖励动机可使睡眠剥夺后的时间注意力正常化。
J Sleep Res. 2019 Aug;28(4):e12796. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12796. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
9
Mental fatigue and temporal preparation in simple reaction-time performance.简单反应时任务中的心理疲劳与时间准备
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jan;133(1):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
10
Modulation of neural activity by motivational and spatial biases.动机和空间偏差对神经活动的调节。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2489-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.029. Epub 2011 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of physical and cognitive effort on time perception.身体和认知努力对时间感知的作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 15;15(1):25595. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07814-9.
2
On the temporal dynamics of reward utilization in dual-task situations.关于双任务情境中奖励利用的时间动态。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May;87(4):1249-1269. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03058-x. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
3
Mobilizing effort to reduce lapses of sustained attention: examining the effects of content-free cues, feedback, and points.调动力量以减少持续注意力的失误:检验无内容提示、反馈和积分的效果。

本文引用的文献

1
Modulating rest-break length induces differential recruitment of automatic and controlled attentional processes upon task reengagement.调节休息时长会在重新投入任务时引发自动和受控注意力过程的不同程度的调动。
Neuroimage. 2016 Jul 1;134:64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.077. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
2
Disrupting monotony while increasing demand: benefits of rest and intervening tasks on vigilance.打破单调的同时增加需求:休息和干预任务对警觉性的益处。
Psychol Res. 2017 Mar;81(2):432-444. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0752-7. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
3
What Is Ego Depletion? Toward a Mechanistic Revision of the Resource Model of Self-Control.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Dec 16. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01254-0.
4
Hybrid framework of fatigue: connecting motivational control and computational moderators to gamma oscillations.疲劳的混合框架:将动机控制和计算调节因素与伽马振荡联系起来。
Front Neuroergon. 2024 May 28;5:1375913. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2024.1375913. eCollection 2024.
5
Individual differences in attention control: A meta-analysis and re-analysis of latent variable studies.注意力控制的个体差异:潜在变量研究的元分析与再分析
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2487-2533. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02516-1. Epub 2024 May 20.
6
Side effects of monaural beat stimulation during sustained mental work on mind wandering and performance measures.持续脑力工作期间单耳节拍刺激对思维游荡和绩效指标的副作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 19;15:1375717. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1375717. eCollection 2024.
7
Effects of goal-setting on sustained attention and attention lapses.目标设定对维持注意力和注意力不集中的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1594-1608. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02803-4. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
8
The effect of motivational and instructional self-talk on attentional control under noise distraction.动机性和指令性自我谈话对噪声干扰下注意力控制的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 29;18(9):e0292321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292321. eCollection 2023.
9
Pupillary correlates of preparatory control in the Stroop task.Stroop 任务中预备性控制的瞳孔相关物。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Oct;85(7):2277-2295. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02751-z. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
10
On doing multi-act arithmetic: A multitrait-multimethod approach of performance dimensions in integrated multitasking.论多行为算术:综合多任务中绩效维度的多特质-多方法路径
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 18;13:946626. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946626. eCollection 2022.
自我损耗是什么?对自我控制的资源模型的机械性修正。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep;7(5):450-63. doi: 10.1177/1745691612454134.
4
A comparison of the psychological refractory period and prioritized processing paradigms: Can the response-selection bottleneck model explain them both?心理不应期与优先加工范式的比较:反应选择瓶颈模型能否同时解释二者?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Oct;41(5):1420-41. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000103. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
5
A resource-control account of sustained attention: evidence from mind-wandering and vigilance paradigms.资源控制论对持续注意力的解释:来自走神和警戒范式的证据。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;10(1):82-96. doi: 10.1177/1745691614556681.
6
Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: Superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions.冲突任务中的自动与受控刺激处理:叠加扩散过程与δ函数
Cogn Psychol. 2015 May;78:148-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
7
Rest is best: the role of rest and task interruptions on vigilance.休息是最佳选择:休息和任务中断对警觉性的影响
Cognition. 2015 Jan;134:165-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
8
The time-event correlation effect is due to temporal expectancy, not to partial transition costs.时事件关联效应是由于时间预期,而不是部分转换成本。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Feb;41(1):196-218. doi: 10.1037/a0038328. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
9
Motivation and cognitive control: from behavior to neural mechanism.动机和认知控制:从行为到神经机制。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:83-113. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015044. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
10
Time-based event expectations employ relative, not absolute, representations of time.基于时间的事件预期采用的是时间的相对表征,而非绝对表征。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Jun;22(3):890-5. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0710-6.