• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目标设定对维持注意力和注意力不集中的影响。

Effects of goal-setting on sustained attention and attention lapses.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.

Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1594-1608. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02803-4. Epub 2023 Oct 23.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-023-02803-4
PMID:37872435
Abstract

In three experiments, we examined the effects of goal-setting on sustained attention and attention lapses. We measured both behavioral task performance and subjective attentional states during a four -choice reaction time task (Experiments 1 and 2 administered online; Experiment 3 conducted in-person). Experiment 1 compared a vague goal versus a specific goal. The specific goal reduced lapses in the form of long response times (RTs) but did not impact task-unrelated thoughts. Experiment 2 expanded on E1 by making the specific goal progressively harder. Behavioral lapses (i.e., long RTs) were reduced in the harder-over-time goal condition compared to the control condition. Additionally, while RTs increased with time-on-task in the control condition, RTs in the harder-over-time goal condition remained stable with time-on-task. Experiment 3 aimed to replicate the results of E2 in-person and adjusted the difficulty of the harder-over-time goals to be slightly harder. The results largely replicated E2. Overall, setting specific and difficult task goals led to a reduction in lapses of attention and increased sustained attention performance.

摘要

在三个实验中,我们考察了目标设定对持续注意力和注意力失误的影响。我们在四项选择反应时任务中测量了行为任务表现和主观注意状态(实验 1 和 2 在线进行;实验 3 亲自进行)。实验 1 比较了模糊目标和具体目标。具体目标减少了以长反应时间(RT)形式出现的失误,但并没有影响与任务无关的想法。实验 2 通过使具体目标逐渐变得更难来扩展 E1。与对照条件相比,在随时间推移而变得更难的目标条件下,行为失误(即长 RT)减少了。此外,在对照条件下,随着任务时间的增加 RT 会增加,但在随时间推移而变得更难的目标条件下,RT 保持稳定。实验 3 的目的是在亲自进行中复制 E2 的结果,并调整随时间推移而变得更难的目标的难度,使其稍微难一点。结果在很大程度上复制了 E2。总的来说,设定具体和困难的任务目标会减少注意力失误,提高持续注意力表现。

相似文献

1
Effects of goal-setting on sustained attention and attention lapses.目标设定对维持注意力和注意力不集中的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1594-1608. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02803-4. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
2
Examining the effects of goal-setting, feedback, and incentives on sustained attention.考察目标设定、反馈和激励对持续注意力的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Jun;47(6):869-891. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000926.
3
The automatic orienting of attention to goal-relevant stimuli.注意力自动定向到与目标相关的刺激上。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 May;134(1):61-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
4
Momentary lapses of attention in multisensory environment.多感官环境中的瞬间注意力不集中。
Cortex. 2020 Oct;131:195-209. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
5
Parkinson's disease is associated with goal setting deficits during task switching.帕金森病与任务转换过程中的目标设定缺陷有关。
Brain Cogn. 2004 Apr;54(3):260-2. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.043.
6
Natural scene stimuli and lapses of sustained attention.自然场景刺激与持续注意力的不集中。
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Dec;21(4):1617-25. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.08.009. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
7
The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention.注意力瞬间失误的神经基础。
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jul;9(7):971-8. doi: 10.1038/nn1727. Epub 2006 Jun 11.
8
Assessing the impact of attention fluctuations on statistical learning.评估注意力波动对统计学习的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 May;86(4):1086-1107. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02805-2. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
9
Who's calling the shots? Intentional content and feelings of control.谁在掌控局面?刻意的内容与掌控感。
Conscious Cogn. 2007 Dec;16(4):859-76. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.08.002. Epub 2006 Oct 12.
10
Dimension- and space-based intertrial effects in visual pop-out search: modulation by task demands for focal-attentional processing.视觉弹出式搜索中基于维度和空间的试验间效应:焦点注意力处理任务需求的调节作用
Psychol Res. 2009 Mar;73(2):186-97. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0206-y. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
On the temporal dynamics of reward utilization in dual-task situations.关于双任务情境中奖励利用的时间动态。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May;87(4):1249-1269. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03058-x. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
2
Feeling tired versus feeling relaxed: Two faces of low physiological arousal.感到疲倦与感到放松:低生理唤醒的两面。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 9;19(9):e0310034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310034. eCollection 2024.
3
Sustained attention can be measured using a brief computerized attention task.可以使用简短的计算机化注意任务来测量持续注意力。

本文引用的文献

1
Go-stimuli probability influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective.Go 刺激概率影响反应任务中的反应偏差:信号检测理论视角。
Psychol Res. 2023 Mar;87(2):509-518. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01679-7. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
2
Examining the effects of goal-setting, feedback, and incentives on sustained attention.考察目标设定、反馈和激励对持续注意力的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Jun;47(6):869-891. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000926.
3
Working memory capacity and sustained attention: A cognitive-energetic perspective.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 24;14(1):17001. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68093-4.
4
Hybrid framework of fatigue: connecting motivational control and computational moderators to gamma oscillations.疲劳的混合框架:将动机控制和计算调节因素与伽马振荡联系起来。
Front Neuroergon. 2024 May 28;5:1375913. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2024.1375913. eCollection 2024.
5
Side effects of monaural beat stimulation during sustained mental work on mind wandering and performance measures.持续脑力工作期间单耳节拍刺激对思维游荡和绩效指标的副作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 19;15:1375717. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1375717. eCollection 2024.
6
On the nonlinearity of the foreperiod effect.关于前周期效应的非线性
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 2;14(1):2780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53347-y.
工作记忆容量和持续性注意:认知能量观点。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Jan;46(1):77-103. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000712. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
4
Examining the effects of probe frequency, response options, and framing within the thought-probe method.探讨思维探测法中探测频率、反应选项和框架的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):398-408. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01212-6.
5
Attentional disengagements in educational contexts: a diary investigation of everyday mind-wandering and distraction.教育情境中的注意力分散:一项关于日常走神和分心的日记式调查。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0070-7. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
6
Cognitive and contextual correlates of spontaneous and deliberate mind-wandering.自发与刻意走神的认知及情境关联因素
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jan;44(1):85-98. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000444. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
Spontaneous default network activity reflects behavioral variability independent of mind-wandering.自发默认网络活动反映了与走神无关的行为变异性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 29;113(48):13899-13904. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611743113. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
8
Mobilizing cognition for speeded action: try-harder instructions promote motivated readiness in the constant-foreperiod paradigm.调动认知以实现快速行动:“更加努力尝试”的指令在恒定前间隔范式中促进动机性准备状态。
Psychol Res. 2017 Nov;81(6):1135-1151. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0810-1. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
9
Rewards boost sustained attention through higher effort: A value-based decision making approach.奖励通过更高的努力提升持续注意力:一种基于价值的决策方法。
Biol Psychol. 2016 Oct;120:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.07.019. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
10
Motivation, intentionality, and mind wandering: Implications for assessments of task-unrelated thought.动机、意向性与走神:对与任务无关思维评估的启示
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Sep;41(5):1417-1425. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000116. Epub 2015 Mar 2.