de la Sierra Alejandro, Pareja Julia, Armario Pedro, Barrera Ángela, Yun Sergi, Vázquez Susana, Sans Laia, Pascual Julio, Oliveras Anna
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Mutua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de l'Esperit Sant, Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Spain.
Am J Hypertens. 2017 Jan;30(1):37-41. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpw085. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
Sympathetic renal denervation (SRD) has been proposed as a therapeutic alternative for patients with resistant hypertension not controlled on pharmacological therapy. Two studies have suggested an effect of SRD in reducing short-term blood pressure variability (BPV). However, this has not been addressed in a randomized comparative trial. We aimed to compare the effects of spironolactone and SRD on circadian BP and BPV.
This is a post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial in 24 true resistant hypertensive patients (15 men, 9 women; mean age 64 years) comparing 50mg of spironolactone (n = 13) vs. SRD (n = 11) on 24-hour BP. We report here the comparative effects on daytime (8 am-10 pm) and nighttime (0 am-6 am) BP, night-to-day ratios and BP and heart rate variabilities (SD and coefficient of variation of 24-hour, day and night, as well as weighted SD and average real variability (ARV)).
Spironolactone was more effective than SRD in reducing daytime systolic (P = 0.006), daytime diastolic (P = 0.006), and nighttime systolic (P = 0.050) BP. No differences were observed in the night-to-day ratios. In contrast, SRD-reduced diastolic BPV (24 hours, daytime, nighttime, weighted, and ARV; all P < 0.05) with respect to spironolactone, without significant differences in systolic BPV.
Spironolactone is more effective than SRD in reducing ambulatory BP. However, BPV is significantly more reduced with SRD. This effect could be important in terms of potential prevention beyond BP reduction and deserves further investigation.
对于药物治疗无法控制的顽固性高血压患者,交感神经肾动脉去神经术(SRD)已被提议作为一种治疗选择。两项研究表明,SRD在降低短期血压变异性(BPV)方面有一定作用。然而,这一点尚未在随机对照试验中得到验证。我们旨在比较螺内酯和SRD对昼夜血压及BPV的影响。
这是一项对24例真正的顽固性高血压患者(15例男性,9例女性;平均年龄64岁)进行的随机试验的事后分析,比较50mg螺内酯(n = 13)与SRD(n = 11)对24小时血压的影响。我们在此报告对日间(上午8点至晚上10点)和夜间(凌晨0点至6点)血压、夜间与日间比值以及血压和心率变异性(24小时、日间和夜间的标准差及变异系数,以及加权标准差和平均实际变异性(ARV))的比较结果。
螺内酯在降低日间收缩压(P = 0.006)、日间舒张压(P = 0.006)和夜间收缩压(P = 0.050)方面比SRD更有效。夜间与日间比值未观察到差异。相比之下,SRD相对于螺内酯降低了舒张压BPV(24小时、日间、夜间、加权及ARV;所有P < 0.05),收缩压BPV无显著差异。
螺内酯在降低动态血压方面比SRD更有效。然而,SRD能更显著地降低BPV。就血压降低之外的潜在预防而言,这一作用可能很重要,值得进一步研究。