Buttery R, Wise G
Department of Anatomy, University of Tasmania, Australia.
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1989 Feb;17(1):63-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1989.tb00488.x.
We have set out critically to assess the current percutaneous technique of retrobulbar anaesthesia. Access to the confined space within the muscle cone is limited by the globe itself and the medially directed lateral orbital wall. By approaching the retrobulbar muscle space with a curved needle through the inferior conjunctival sac these anatomical constraints are overcome. This technique is referred to as conal anaesthesia. A quantitative comparison of the two techniques demonstrates that the conal approach produces more reliable and effective muscle block with faster onset of action than conventional percutaneous anaesthesia. The conal approach is safe and offers advantages with its ease of application, excellent anaesthesia and akinesis and through its rapid and consistent results.
我们已审慎地着手评估当前经皮球后麻醉技术。眼球本身及向内侧的眶外侧壁限制了进入肌锥内狭窄间隙的途径。通过弯曲的针头经下结膜囊进入球后肌间隙,可克服这些解剖学限制。该技术被称为锥内麻醉。两种技术的定量比较表明,与传统经皮麻醉相比,锥内入路产生的肌肉阻滞更可靠、有效,起效更快。锥内入路安全,且具有易于应用、麻醉效果和眼球运动阻滞良好以及结果快速且一致等优点。