Wang Wenjun, Liu Shangli, He Gengsheng, Yan Yiguo, Li Xuelin, Ouyang Zhihua, Zuo Jianhong
*Department of Spinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang, HuNan Province, China †The Orthopaedic Department of Sun YiXian Hospital of Zhongshan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Oct;41 Suppl 19:B38-B43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001820.
This prospective observational study included 22 patients who were diagnosed with symptomatic degenerative disc disease treated via artificial disc replacement (ADR) with a laparoscopic technique.
The current study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ADR using a laparoscopic technique for lumbar disc herniation.
Symptomatic degenerative disc disease is the major cause of low back pain with lumbar segmental instability. ADR has increased in popularity as an alternative treatment for lumbar disc herniation. However, the traditional approach to spinal surgery carries the risk of catastrophic bleeding from injury to major vessels, as well as iatrogenic injury to the viscera and associated structures. Therefore, laparoscopic lumbar discectomy and ADR may represent a useful alternative.
Twenty-two patients (8 males and 14 females) who were diagnosed with symptomatic degenerative disc disease were included in this study. Seven cases involved the L4/5 level, and 15 cases involved the L5/S1 level. All patients were ineffective after at least 6 months of conservative treatments; all patients were informed of the surgery before the operation and provided consent. Three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography (3D-CTA) of the iliac great blood vessels was completed before the surgery. All surgical procedures were performed under a laparoscope. All patients were followed up.
All surgeries were successfully completed. The average operation time was 120 minutes (range 110-150 min), and the average hemorrhage was 145 mL (range 80-360 mL). All cases underwent X-rays at 3 days, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and the final postoperative follow-up. The outcome indicated that there was no mobilization, displacement, or subsidence in all patients with the exception of one case with prosthesis migration. The follow-up time was 43.8 months (range 24-64 months). The mean visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry scores were decreased postoperatively. The mean improvement rate of the VAS score was 73.5%.
Lumbar ADR using a laparoscope represents a novel, minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic degenerative disc disease and severe lumbar discogenic pain.
这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了22例经腹腔镜技术行人工椎间盘置换(ADR)治疗的有症状性退行性椎间盘疾病患者。
本研究旨在评估腹腔镜技术用于腰椎间盘突出症的人工椎间盘置换术的安全性和有效性。
有症状性退行性椎间盘疾病是导致伴有腰椎节段性不稳定的下腰痛的主要原因。人工椎间盘置换术作为腰椎间盘突出症的一种替代治疗方法越来越受欢迎。然而,传统的脊柱手术方法存在因损伤大血管导致灾难性出血以及对内脏和相关结构造成医源性损伤的风险。因此,腹腔镜下腰椎间盘切除术和人工椎间盘置换术可能是一种有用的替代方法。
本研究纳入了22例被诊断为有症状性退行性椎间盘疾病的患者(8例男性和14例女性)。7例涉及L4/5节段,15例涉及L5/S节段。所有患者经至少6个月的保守治疗均无效;所有患者在手术前均被告知手术情况并签署同意书。术前完成了髂总大血管的三维计算机断层血管造影(3D-CTA)。所有手术操作均在腹腔镜下进行。所有患者均进行了随访。
所有手术均成功完成。平均手术时间为120分钟(范围110 - 150分钟),平均出血量为145毫升(范围80 - 360毫升)。所有病例在术后3天、3个月、6个月、1年及最后一次术后随访时均进行了X线检查。结果表明,除1例假体移位外,所有患者均未出现松动、移位或下沉。随访时间为43.8个月(范围24 - 64个月)。术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry评分均值均下降。VAS评分的平均改善率为73.5%。
腹腔镜下人工椎间盘置换术是一种治疗有症状性退行性椎间盘疾病和严重腰椎间盘源性疼痛的新型微创治疗方法。