IEEE Trans Image Process. 2016 Dec;25(12):5538-5551. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2016.2609807. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
Most state-of-the-art methods in pedestrian detection are unable to achieve a good trade-off between accuracy and efficiency. For example, ACF has a fast speed but a relatively low detection rate, while checkerboards have a high detection rate but a slow speed. Inspired by some simple inherent attributes of pedestrians (i.e., appearance constancy and shape symmetry), we propose two new types of non-neighboring features: side-inner difference features (SIDF) and symmetrical similarity features (SSFs). SIDF can characterize the difference between the background and pedestrian and the difference between the pedestrian contour and its inner part. SSF can capture the symmetrical similarity of pedestrian shape. However, it is difficult for neighboring features to have such above characterization abilities. Finally, we propose to combine both non-neighboring features and neighboring features for pedestrian detection. It is found that non-neighboring features can further decrease the log-average miss rate by 4.44%. The relationship between our proposed method and some state-of-the-art methods is also given. Experimental results on INRIA, Caltech, and KITTI data sets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed method. Compared with the state-of-the-art methods without using CNN, our method achieves the best detection performance on Caltech, outperforming the second best method (i.e., checkerboards) by 2.27%. Using the new annotations of Caltech, it can achieve 11.87% miss rate, which outperforms other methods.
最先进的行人检测方法在准确性和效率之间往往难以取得良好的平衡。例如,ACF 速度很快但检测率相对较低,而棋盘格检测率高但速度较慢。受行人一些简单固有属性(即外观恒常性和形状对称性)的启发,我们提出了两种新的非邻接特征:侧内差分特征(SIDF)和对称相似特征(SSF)。SIDF 可以描述背景与行人之间的差异,以及行人轮廓与其内部之间的差异。SSF 可以捕获行人形状的对称相似性。然而,邻接特征很难具有上述特征描述能力。最后,我们提出了结合非邻接特征和邻接特征进行行人检测。实验结果表明,非邻接特征可以将对数平均漏检率进一步降低 4.44%。我们提出的方法与一些最先进方法之间的关系也给出了。在 INRIA、Caltech 和 KITTI 数据集上的实验结果证明了所提出方法的有效性和效率。与不使用 CNN 的最先进方法相比,我们的方法在 Caltech 上取得了最佳的检测性能,比排名第二的方法(即棋盘格)高出 2.27%。使用 Caltech 的新标注,它可以达到 11.87%的漏检率,优于其他方法。