• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科I期实体瘤肿瘤学试验中细胞毒性药物与分子靶向药物的安全性和疗效比较。

A comparison of safety and efficacy of cytotoxic versus molecularly targeted drugs in pediatric phase I solid tumor oncology trials.

作者信息

Dorris Kathleen, Liu Chunyan, Li Dandan, Hummel Trent R, Wang Xia, Perentesis John, Kim Mi-Ok, Fouladi Maryam

机构信息

Section of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.

Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Mar;64(3). doi: 10.1002/pbc.26258. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1002/pbc.26258
PMID:27654490
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior reviews of phase I pediatric oncology trials involving primarily cytotoxic agents have reported objective response rates (ORRs) and toxic death rates of 7.9-9.6% and 0.5%, respectively. These data may not reflect safety and efficacy in phase I trials of molecularly targeted (targeted) drugs.

METHODS

A systematic review of pediatric phase I solid tumor trials published in 1990-2013 was performed. The published reports were evaluated for patient characteristics, toxicity information, and response numbers.

RESULTS

A total of 143 phase I pediatric clinical trials enrolling 3,896 children involving 53 targeted and 48 cytotoxic drugs were identified. A meta-analysis demonstrated that the ORR is 2.1-fold higher with cytotoxic drugs (0.066 vs. 0.031 per subject; P = 0.007). By contrast, the pooled estimate of the stable disease rate (SDR) is similar for cytotoxic and targeted drugs (0.2 vs. 0.23 per subject; P = 0.27).  The pooled estimate of the dose-limiting toxicity rate is 1.8-fold larger with cytotoxic drugs (0.24 vs. 0.13 per subject; P = 0.0003). The hematologic grade 3-4 (G3/4) toxicity rate is 3.6-fold larger with cytotoxic drugs (0.43 vs. 0.12 per treatment course; P = 0.0001); however, the nonhematologic G3/4 toxicities and toxic deaths occur at similar rates for cytotoxic and targeted drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

In phase I pediatric solid tumor trials, ORRs were significantly higher for cytotoxic versus targeted agents. SDRs were similar in targeted and cytotoxic drug trials. Patients treated with cytotoxic agents were more likely to experience hematologic G3/4 toxicities than those patients receiving targeted drugs.

摘要

背景

先前对主要涉及细胞毒性药物的I期儿科肿瘤试验的综述报告称,客观缓解率(ORR)和毒性死亡率分别为7.9 - 9.6%和0.5%。这些数据可能无法反映分子靶向(靶向)药物I期试验的安全性和有效性。

方法

对1990 - 2013年发表的儿科I期实体瘤试验进行系统综述。对已发表的报告进行患者特征、毒性信息和缓解病例数评估。

结果

共确定了143项I期儿科临床试验,纳入3896名儿童,涉及53种靶向药物和48种细胞毒性药物。荟萃分析表明,细胞毒性药物的ORR高2.1倍(每位受试者分别为0.066和0.031;P = 0.007)。相比之下,细胞毒性药物和靶向药物的疾病稳定率(SDR)合并估计值相似(每位受试者分别为0.2和0.23;P = 0.27)。细胞毒性药物的剂量限制毒性率合并估计值高1.8倍(每位受试者分别为0.24和0.13;P = 0.0003)。细胞毒性药物的血液学3 - 4级(G3/4)毒性率高3.6倍(每个治疗疗程分别为0.43和0.12;P = 0.0001);然而,细胞毒性药物和靶向药物的非血液学G3/4毒性及毒性死亡发生率相似。

结论

在I期儿科实体瘤试验中,细胞毒性药物的ORR显著高于靶向药物。靶向药物试验和细胞毒性药物试验中的SDR相似。接受细胞毒性药物治疗的患者比接受靶向药物治疗的患者更易出现血液学G3/4毒性。

相似文献

1
A comparison of safety and efficacy of cytotoxic versus molecularly targeted drugs in pediatric phase I solid tumor oncology trials.儿科I期实体瘤肿瘤学试验中细胞毒性药物与分子靶向药物的安全性和疗效比较。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Mar;64(3). doi: 10.1002/pbc.26258. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
2
A Systematic Review of Pediatric Phase I Trials in Oncology: Toxicity and Outcomes in the Era of Targeted Therapies.儿科肿瘤学 I 期临床试验的系统评价:靶向治疗时代的毒性和结局。
Oncologist. 2020 Jun;25(6):532-540. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0615. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
3
Evaluation of the Safety and Benefit of Phase I Oncology Trials for Patients With Primary CNS Tumors.原发性中枢神经系统肿瘤患者I期肿瘤试验的安全性和获益评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 1;33(28):3186-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.1525. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
4
Revisiting Risk and Benefit in Early Oncology Trials in the Era of Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Phase I Trials of Targeted Single-Agent Anticancer Therapies.重新审视精准医学时代早期肿瘤学试验中的风险和获益:靶向单药抗肿瘤治疗的 I 期试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Nov;5:17-26. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00214.
5
Towards new methods for the determination of dose limiting toxicities and the assessment of the recommended dose for further studies of molecularly targeted agents--dose-Limiting Toxicity and Toxicity Assessment Recommendation Group for Early Trials of Targeted therapies, an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-led study.针对新型方法以确定剂量限制性毒性和评估分子靶向药物进一步研究的推荐剂量 - 欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织主导的靶向治疗早期试验的剂量限制毒性和毒性评估推荐小组的研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Aug;50(12):2040-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.04.031. Epub 2014 May 28.
6
Beyond the dose-limiting toxicity period: Dermatologic adverse events of patients on phase 1 trials of the Cancer Therapeutics Evaluation Program.超越剂量限制毒性期:癌症治疗评估计划1期试验患者的皮肤不良事件
Cancer. 2016 Apr 15;122(8):1228-37. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29918. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
7
Defining the risk of toxicity in phase I oncology trials of novel molecularly targeted agents: a single centre experience.定义新型分子靶向药物 I 期肿瘤临床试验的毒性风险:单中心经验。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Aug;23(8):1968-1973. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds030. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
8
Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial.基于肿瘤分子谱的分子靶向治疗与晚期癌症的常规治疗(SHIVA):一项多中心、开放标签、概念验证、随机、对照的 2 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1324-34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00188-6. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
9
Risk and Benefit for Targeted Therapy Agents in Pediatric Phase II Trials in Oncology: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis.肿瘤儿科 II 期试验中靶向治疗药物的风险与获益:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Target Oncol. 2021 Jul;16(4):415-424. doi: 10.1007/s11523-021-00822-5. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
10
Challenges of phase 1 clinical trials evaluating immune checkpoint-targeted antibodies.评价免疫检查点靶向抗体的 I 期临床试验面临的挑战。
Ann Oncol. 2016 Feb;27(2):214-24. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv550. Epub 2015 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Contemporary Characteristics and Outcomes of Pediatric Oncology Patients Participating in Early Phase Clinical Trials.参与早期临床试验的儿科肿瘤患者的当代特征与结局
Cancer Med. 2025 Sep;14(17):e71222. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71222.
2
Pediatric Tumors as Disorders of Development: The Case for In Vitro Modeling Based on Human Stem Cells.儿科肿瘤作为发育障碍:基于人类干细胞的体外建模案例。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241270564. doi: 10.1177/10732748241270564.
3
Risk and Benefit for Targeted Therapy Agents in Pediatric Phase II Trials in Oncology: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis.
肿瘤儿科 II 期试验中靶向治疗药物的风险与获益:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Target Oncol. 2021 Jul;16(4):415-424. doi: 10.1007/s11523-021-00822-5. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
4
Opportunities and Challenges in Drug Development for Pediatric Cancers.儿科癌症药物研发的机遇与挑战。
Cancer Discov. 2021 Mar;11(3):545-559. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0779. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
5
A Systematic Review of Pediatric Phase I Trials in Oncology: Toxicity and Outcomes in the Era of Targeted Therapies.儿科肿瘤学 I 期临床试验的系统评价:靶向治疗时代的毒性和结局。
Oncologist. 2020 Jun;25(6):532-540. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0615. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
6
Reprioritizing Risk and Benefit: The Future of Study Design in Early-Phase Cancer Research.重新评估风险与获益:早期癌症研究中研究设计的未来
Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Nov;41(6):2-11. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500033.
7
Transcriptome based individualized therapy of refractory pediatric sarcomas: feasibility, tolerability and efficacy.基于转录组的难治性儿童肉瘤个体化治疗:可行性、耐受性和疗效。
Oncotarget. 2018 Apr 17;9(29):20747-20760. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25087.
8
Random-effects meta-analysis for systematic reviews of phase I clinical trials: Rare events and missing data.随机效应荟萃分析在 I 期临床试验系统评价中的应用:罕见事件和缺失数据。
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Jun;8(2):124-135. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1209. Epub 2016 Jun 10.